The Latest Breaking News from Thomas

The decision this term that has the largest potential for a legal "jolt" was Mallory.

I've known Michael Rosman at the Center for Individual Rights for almost 30 years; he has litigated many important cases, including with regard to racial preferences, and was one of the lawyers in Grutter v. Bollinger. I'm therefore delighted to pass along his short reactions to Students for Fair Admission…

The Supreme Court did not overturn the standing holding of MAssachusetts v. EPA, but it may have left it on life support.

Justice Kavanaugh penned a narrow decision that cobbled together a majority.

Some worth-what-you-paid-for-them predictions for the final(?) week of SCOTUS opinions.

United States v. Hansen signals the Court is not willing to "strike down" laws that may, hypothetically, burden someone else's speech rights.

I much appreciated the guest-post by Prof. Lorianne Updike Toler (Northern Illinois) on Brackeen back in November, based on her recent University of Chicago Law Review article, The Missing Indian Affairs Clause; now that Brackeen has been handed down, I thought I'd pass along this follow-up: Halaand v. Brackeen, which…

Don't act surprised when Thomas narrowly reads made-up Brennan decision from 1968 that itself reversed precedent.

Along with penicillin and morphine, asking and listening are among the most essential tools in our medicine cabinets, writes medical student Thomas Swinburn