Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Jacob Sullum

Trump's Judge Bashing Provokes a Rebuke From Chief Justice John Roberts (Again)

"For more than two centuries," Chief Justice John Roberts said on Tuesday, "it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

Although Roberts did not mention Donald Trump, the timing suggested he was responding to a Tuesday-morning Truth Social rant in which the president declared that federal judges who impede his agenda "should be IMPEACHED!!!" That recommendation echoed presidential adviser Elon Musk's oft-repeated solution to the inconvenience of judicial review—a prescription that would undermine the rule of law by punishing judges for daring to disagree with the president.

Trump's post referred specifically to U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who is considering a challenge to deportations based on the rarely invoked Alien Enemies Act. That 1798 law authorizes the president to deport "natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects" of a "hostile nation or government" when there is "a declared war" with that nation or government or it has mounted an "invasion or predatory incursion." The law does not provide much in the way of due process, although it does charge judges with conducting "a full examination and hearing" of each complaint against "any alien enemy resident." The Trump administration controversially argues that the law can be applied to suspected members of Latin American gangs.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.