Judge Juan Merchan is currently addressing language related to intent to conceal or commit another crime in the ongoing trial.
During the proceedings, Trump attorney Emil Bove raised an objection to language proposed by prosecutors. Bove argued that the language in question draws the jury's attention to elements that the government is not required to prove.
Bove expressed concerns about a potential risk of burden-shifting if the language is allowed to stand. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that the jury's focus remains on the essential elements of the case.
In response to Bove's objection, Judge Merchan indicated that he would not make an immediate ruling on the matter. The judge is likely taking time to carefully consider the arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense before reaching a decision.
The debate over the language used in the trial highlights the complexities involved in legal proceedings and the importance of ensuring a fair and impartial process for all parties involved.
