Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

JD Vance Downplays Importance Of Ukraine To US Interests

Republican vice presidential nominee Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, speaks at a campaign event, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024 in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Matt York)

Republican vice presidential nominee JD Vance recently made controversial statements regarding the importance of Ukraine to the United States in comparison to other regions of the world. Vance expressed his belief that Ukraine is not as crucial to US interests as regions like Taiwan, the world's leading manufacturer of semiconductor chips.

During an appearance on 'The Tim Dillon Show' podcast, Vance stated, 'Taiwan makes so much of the computer chips, which is such a driver of all economic growth, that if the Chinese took over Taiwan, it would be really bad for us.' He emphasized the economic significance of Taiwan and downplayed the strategic importance of Ukraine.

Furthermore, Vance dismissed the idea that Russian President Vladimir Putin would extend his military actions beyond Ukraine into Europe. He described the notion of Putin marching through Europe as 'absurd' and questioned the feasibility of such a scenario. Vance expressed skepticism about the likelihood of Putin advancing further than his current objectives in Ukraine.

Vance doubts Putin's intentions to extend military actions beyond Ukraine into Europe.
JD Vance prioritizes Taiwan's semiconductor industry over Ukraine for US interests.
He calls the idea of Putin marching through Europe 'absurd' and questions its feasibility.

In terms of US foreign policy and defense alliances, Vance highlighted the need for NATO member countries to contribute more to their own defense and security. He emphasized the importance of NATO functioning as a true alliance rather than solely relying on the United States for support. Vance's comments align with a broader discussion within NATO about burden-sharing and each member's commitment to collective defense.

These statements from Vance come in the context of previous remarks made by former President Donald Trump regarding NATO. Trump had suggested that he would not necessarily uphold the collective-defense clause of the alliance for countries failing to meet defense spending guidelines. Vance's perspective on US foreign policy and defense alliances reflects ongoing debates within the Republican Party regarding America's global commitments and priorities.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.