Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Bangkok Post
Bangkok Post
Comment

Energy reality trumps rhetoric on climate

As the world pursues decarbonisation, the concept of a "just transition" has become ubiquitous, particularly when describing the shift away from fossil fuels in emerging and developing economies. Emissions targets at the global and national levels are viewed as the main drivers of the energy transition, and the climate policies developed to meet those targets must balance environmental and social objectives.

But decarbonisation is not always the product of a planned emissions-reduction pathway. In fact, with the cost of renewables continuing to fall, many emerging and developing countries now see phasing out fossil fuels as a matter of economic survival and energy security.

For example, in January 2024, Ethiopia banned the import of petrol and diesel vehicles with immediate effect. The move was striking precisely because it was framed not as a climate commitment, but as a way to reduce its annual fossil-fuel import bill of more than US$5 billion (162.6 billion baht), which consumed a huge share of the country's scarce foreign-currency reserves.

With the country constructing Africa's largest hydroelectric dam, it made little economic sense to remain dependent on expensive fuel imports to power transport. Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) quickly filled the market gap created by the ban; the streets of Addis Ababa are now teeming with BYD cars.

Tax exemptions and import duty waivers for EVs, coupled with the rising costs of second-hand internal-combustion-engine vehicles, have accelerated this shift in consumer behaviour. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which was officially opened in September 2025, produces enough surplus hydropower to run these EVs cheaply.

Crucially, economic and energy-security concerns, not a formal emissions-reduction framework, were responsible for such rapid decarbonisation. A similar pattern seems to hold in Pakistan.

The country's swift uptake of solar power reflected factors that created an opportunity for disruptive change, not green advocacy or a national climate plan.

In 2022, a massive flood left roughly a third of the country underwater and caused more than $30 billion in economic damage, straining government budgets, reducing household incomes, and undermining the state's ability to operate public utilities. With energy costs rising, there was a clear need for an alternative to diesel generation.

Meanwhile, China had surplus solar-panel production, and the US had imposed import restrictions. Pakistan took advantage of China's discounted solar panels to adopt renewable generation at a rapid clip.

Likewise, the liberalisation of South Africa's power market, coupled with load shedding (imposed blackouts) and rising electricity tariffs, led to a 349% increase in installed solar rooftop capacity in one year. While South Africa has been following an emissions-reduction pathway for decades, an affordability crisis ultimately drove widespread decarbonisation.

These countries are moving away from fossil fuels largely because of mounting economic and energy pressures, rather than a narrow focus on emissions reductions.

But this does not mean that the question of justice disappears. Lower-income households account for a smaller share of the roughly 8 gigawatts of rooftop solar installed in South Africa, reflecting high upfront costs. Crisis-driven decarbonisation still requires efforts to improve affordability and ensure that people from all walks of life can participate in the energy transition.

Policymakers have used the concept of a "just transition" to make a compelling case for decarbonisation. But they should be focusing on how to foster systemic change. Understanding that the primary drivers of solar uptake in South Africa and Pakistan, or EV adoption in Ethiopia, are structural and economic could help policymakers develop better tools and systems.

This also has direct implications for how philanthropists and governments allocate resources. Channelling funding towards grid capacity, storage infrastructure, and affordable financing mechanisms will likely produce more durable results than funding for climate education and communication.

Investing in efforts that aim to improve people's lives, from lower energy bills to unfettered electricity access, will do more to accelerate decarbonisation -- and to change hearts and minds.

To be sure, the world must reduce emissions to prevent the planet from overheating. To achieve that goal, it should focus on expanding energy access and ensuring affordability.  ©2026 Project Syndicate

Saliem Fakir is Founder and Executive Director of the African Climate Foundation.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.