Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
PC Gamer
PC Gamer
Andy Chalk

Battlefield 6 producer insists the game's 'cool' and 'relatable' PMC villain and its quest to destroy the US has no deeper meaning: 'We needed two factions'

A soldier from Battlefield 6. He's got what appears to be a burn scar along his right side and is clenching his jaw while looking off screen. He seems to be under interrogation in a dark room.

We don't know a whole lot about the setting for Battlefield 6, but the broad strokes were revealed late last week: "Major European countries" have pulled out of NATO, leaving the US and some unspecified number of remaining allies to stand alone against a massive mercenary outfit called Pax Armata. It's a scenario that feels at least loosely rooted in reality—how firm is NATO's footing these days, really?—but EA insists that it's not trying to say anything with the setting: There's nothing more to it than practical necessity.

"We needed two factions," executive producer Christian Grass told Polygon about the origins of Pax Armata. "We wanted to create something that felt that it could be real, but it's clearly fiction because we're creating entertainment products."

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.