Best horror novels that are must-reads, from classic spooky tales to terrifying modern page-turners Scare yourself silly Evening Standard · Oct 2, 2024
Man Indicted For Threatening To Lynch "Corrupt" Justice Thomas And His "Insurrectionist" Wife There are consequences to the rhetoric about the Court from high ranking officials. Reason · Sep 19, 2024
The Trump Leaks Are Far Worse Than The Dobbs Leak. Knives are out for Chief Justice Roberts, and poor Justice Alito. Reason · Sep 15, 2024
Severability on the Shadow Docket: SCOTUS Splits 5-4 On Whether Entirety of Title IX Regulations Must Be Enjoined Justice Gorsuch joins the three dissenters on severability. What about Justices Thomas and Barrett? Reason · Aug 17, 2024
Turning The Corner Post On Vacatur Also, Judges Kacsmaryk and Ho seem vindicated on the statute of limitations to challenge mifepristone. Reason · Aug 15, 2024
Justice Gorsuch Explains What Collegiality Means Does it mean going to the opera together, or a willingness to be persuaded? Reason · Aug 4, 2024
Congratulations to Brady Kelly, Back-to-Back Chief Justice of FantasySCOTUS for OT 2022 and 2023 The October 2023 Term of FantasySCOTUS finally came to a close. This term, Chief Justice Roberts cemented himself as the Court's center, as Justice Barrett continues to separate herself from the other Trump appointees. On the whole, this term was more predictable than some recent years. And the FantasySCOTUS prediction… Reason · Jul 31, 2024
Supreme Court faces new leak as inside info on Idaho abortion ruling is released Report describes heated deliberations over whether to reverse decision on high-profile Idaho abortion ban case The Independent UK · Jul 30, 2024
Banana Splits I appreciate the replies from Orin, Will, and Sam. We have very different conceptions on what role a scholar should play and what role a judge should play. My writings in this area are both retrospective and prospective. I look backwards to see what qualifications a judge had at the… Reason · Jul 29, 2024
The Behind the Scenes Wrangling in the Idaho Abortion Case Joan Biskupic reports that the justices were initially inclined to back Idaho in the EMTALA case, until they realized the case was messier than they had thought. Reason · Jul 29, 2024
"I could carve a judge with more backbone out of a banana" What stuff are the Court's middle three Justices made of? Reason · Jul 29, 2024
Making Sense of Justice Barrett's NetChoice Concurrence I don't get the random questions Justice Barrett raises, and I'm not sure why she didn't mention her reservations in Hansen.. Reason · Jul 17, 2024
Making Sense of the Moody Opinions In NetChoice I think it is clear that Justice Alito lost the majority, but the resulting schizophrenic opinions still do not cohere. Reason · Jul 15, 2024
The Supreme Court Refuses To Extend Robinson v. California, A Non-Originalist Decision Even if an erroneous precedent cannot be overruled, isolate the damage, and decline to extend it to new circumstances. Reason · Jul 9, 2024
Reason · Jul 8, 2024 Revisiting the Mueller Report in Light of Trump v. United States Chief Justice Roberts's majority decision in Trump v. United States undermines key aspects of Mueller's framework.
Reason · Jul 5, 2024 What Exactly Did Justice Barrett Agree With Chief Justice Roberts On About Presidential Immunity? We know that she didn't agree on the evidentiary issue. Beyond that, the disjunction is unclear.
Reason · Jul 3, 2024 Presidential Immunity As a Question of Executive Power There is no textual basis for "immunity" as such, but there are structural reasons why some degree of insulation is inevitable.
Reason · Jul 2, 2024 Did Justice Alito Lose The Majority Opinions In Trevino and NetChoice? Alito had only four majority opinions this term, while Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan all had seven.
The Guardian - US · Jul 1, 2024 US supreme court decisions: the biggest cases this term and their outcomes The court has wrapped up its term, issuing a string of blockbuster decisions with the conservative supermajority in the driver’s seat
Reason · Jul 1, 2024 S. Ct. Recognizes Platforms' Right to Choose What Appears in "Curated Feeds," Doesn't Resolve Other Content Moderation Questions In today's Moody v. Netchoice, LLC, the Supreme Court sent back to lower courts the cases considering whether (and when) the Florida and Texas limits on social media content moderation are constitutional. The decision was complicated and limited, so here's a general summary. [1.] Remember that the lawyer's true superpower…
Reason · Jul 1, 2024 Four Justices in Netchoice Flag Question Whether First Amendment Protects AI-Curated Materials From Justice Barrett's concurrence in today's Moody v. Netchoice, LLC: Consider, for instance, how platforms use algorithms to prioritize and remove content on their feeds. Assume that human beings decide to remove posts promoting a particular political candidate or advocating some position on a public-health issue. If they create an…
Reason · Jul 1, 2024 Justice Barrett's Netchoice Concurrence Raises Questions Relevant to TikTok Case From her opinion in Moody v. Netchoice, LLC: Corporations, which are composed of human beings with First Amendment rights, possess First Amendment rights themselves. But foreign persons and corporations located abroad do not. Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l, Inc. [II] (2020)…. What if the platform's…
Reason · Jun 30, 2024 Chief Justice Roberts's Opinions Are Best Read Once But after a second, a third, and a fourth read, all of the fancy veneers and window dressing start to come off.
Reason · Jun 30, 2024 The Stare Decisis Analyses in Dobbs and Loper Bright. Ending the Epicycles of Chevron.
Reason · Jun 30, 2024 John Roberts and the Professoriate (Updated) He really doesn't care what we think.