The Latest Breaking News from Appellant

From yesterday's decision (in my view, a correct decision) by Judge F. Kay Behm (E.D. Mich.) in Doe v. Doe… The post Still No Pseudonymity in #TheyLied Defamation Case Over Sexual Assault Allegations appeared first on Reason.com.

"he must do so under his true name and accept the risk that certain unflattering details may come to light over the course of the litigation."

(as well as other allegations).

From Kruse v. Karlen, decided yesterday by the Missouri Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Kurt Odenwald, joined by Judges Michael E. Gardner and Renée D. Hardin-Tammons (for more on the earlier 13 cases, see these posts): Jonathan R. Karlen ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's grant of…

"Appellant wants the option to hide behind a shield of anonymity in the event he is unsuccessful in proving his claim, but he would surely identify himself if he were to prove his claims."

From Edenfield v. State, decided Wednesday, in an opinion by Judge Bilbrey and joined by Judge Winokur, with Judge Long concurring in the result (for more on the Range case, see here): We deny Appellant's amended motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and to certify a question of great public…

From Commonwealth v. Hanner, decided last week by the Pennsylvania intermediate appellate court, in an opinion by Judge John Bender, joined by Judges Mary Jane Bowes and Megan Sullivan: The facts, as taken in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as the verdict winner, are straightforward. Sometime during 2021,…

From yesterday's Florida Court of Appeal decision in Ahern v. Leon, in an opinion by Judge Alan Forst, joined by Judges Melanie May and Jonathan Gerber; seems quite correct to me: Appellant and Appellee briefly dated in mid-2016 and again from March through July 2017. In October 2017, Appellee informed…