Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Economic Times
The Economic Times
Piyush Shukla

What is the proposed $2,400 Social Security increase? Is it separate from the annual COLA, and when could beneficiaries actually receive the extra $200 each month?

Under a legislative proposal introduced by Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, Social Security recipients across the United States could see an extra $200 added to their monthly checks. This $2,400 annual boost, which supporters and political observers refer to as the "Bernie Bump," is designed as a direct addition to beneficiaries' base payments.

This extra money would be paid on top of standard Social Security distributions as well as the annual cost-of-living adjustments approved under federal law.

The proposed legislation, officially titled the Social Security Expansion Act, was introduced in February 2025. If passed into law, its primary benefit increase would apply broadly across the current beneficiary pool. That includes traditional retirees, individuals receiving Social Security Disability Insurance who rely on monthly payments due to long-term health conditions, and families receiving survivor benefits after losing a primary breadwinner.

The proposed $200 increase is not the same thing as a Social Security COLA

The common misunderstanding is that the “Bernie Bump” is to treat it as another COLA. It is not. The proposal would add $200 a month to benefits, which works out to $2,400 over a year. The annual COLA would remain a separate adjustment to benefits.

A COLA is tied to inflation. The proposed $200 increase would come from a change in federal law.

There is also no separate $2,400 check waiting for beneficiaries. That number is simply the annual value of a $200 monthly increase.

Sanders also want a different inflation measure for future COLAs

The other major change in the bill is less visible than the $200 figure, but it could affect Social Security payments year after year.

Under current law, Social Security's annual COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, known as CPI-W.

Sanders' proposal would use the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly, or CPI-E, instead.

The reasoning is tied to what older Americans actually spend money on. Health care and prescription drugs, for example, can account for a larger part of an older household's budget. CPI-E gives greater weight to those expenses.

That does not mean the CPI-E would guarantee a bigger COLA every year. Inflation does not move in exactly the same way across different categories, so the resulting adjustment could vary from one year to another.

Still, changing the index would change the way Social Security benefits respond to inflation over time.

The bill therefore tries to address two different concerns. One is the size of benefits people receive now. The other is whether future increases keep pace with the expenses that matter most to older Americans.

The plan would raise taxes on higher earnings as Social Security faces a funding gap

The bill would make earnings above $250,000 subject to Social Security payroll taxes again. Sanders' office says 91 percent of households earning $250,000 or less would not face a tax increase under the proposal.

That revenue provision is important because Social Security is already dealing with a long-term financing problem.

The latest trustees' projections put the depletion date for the retirement and survivors trust fund in 2032. Looking at the retirement and disability programs together, the combined trust funds are projected to remain able to pay full scheduled benefits until 2034.

Those dates do not mean Social Security would suddenly stop sending checks. Payroll taxes and other income would still flow into the program after the reserves were depleted.

The problem is the size of the gap. Under the trustees' projections, continuing income would cover only about 83 percent of scheduled benefits for the combined program after trust fund reserves are exhausted. Without changes to the law, the difference would have to be addressed through some combination of lower scheduled benefits, higher revenue or other changes.

That is the backdrop for Sanders' proposal. It does not simply call for larger Social Security checks. It pairs higher benefits with changes intended to bring more money into the system.

There is no official date for a $200 monthly increase, and current Social Security payments continue under existing law.

If Congress eventually passes the legislation and it becomes law, the effect would reach beyond the headline $2,400 figure.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.