Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

U.S. Considers Targeted Response to Attack Amidst Regional Tensions

Attack on small logistics base between Jordan and Tonk.

On October 10th, a small military base in Iraq was attacked by a drone strike, resulting in the deaths of several US service members. The base, located between Jordan and other western bases, is mainly used to support special forces operators conducting training and supply missions with the Jordanian army. The exact details surrounding the attack remain unclear, but potential factors such as malfunctioning air defense equipment or the base being a target of opportunity have been mentioned.

In response to this attack, the United States has vowed to take action. However, there has been some hesitation among officials in order to prevent the escalation of conflicts in the region. The aim is to maintain targeted and focused responses against responsible groups, similar to previous approaches utilized in dealing with Houthi attacks on ships in the Red Sea. This strategy entails identifying the specific group and the location of the drones in order to neutralize them, rather than engaging in actions that could trigger a larger regional war.

While some voices, including Senator Lindsey Graham and Congressman Adam Smith, have advocated for strikes inside Iran as a means of sending a strong message, many experts disagree with this approach. They argue that targeting Iran directly could potentially lead to a wider conflict, given Iran's alliances with other nations such as Russia and China. Instead, the focus should remain on undermining the supply capabilities and command and control elements of these groups, as well as implementing covert actions against Iran's operations in different parts of the country.

It is important to note that Iran, as a state actor, tends to employ proxies rather than directly engaging in conflicts. They view attacks on US troops as retaliation against perceived US presence in regions where Iran believes they should not be. Iran's level of deniability makes it difficult to trace responsibility for these attacks back to them, making any overt strike inside Iran a highly controversial decision that would require concrete evidence of their involvement.

Past administrations, both Republican and Democratic, have chosen not to conduct overt strikes inside Iran during similar situations. Alternative methods, such as cyber attacks or specific actions whose attribution remains ambiguous, have been favored instead. These approaches aim to send a clear message to Tehran without provoking widespread international condemnation.

As investigations continue into this recent drone strike, efforts will be focused on identifying the responsible parties and developing an appropriate response that balances the desire for justice with the need to prevent further escalation of tensions in the region.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.