Consumer champion Which? has slammed seven major airlines for "blatant rule-breaking" and have claimed that there needs to be a major overhaul of travel rules.
Research carried out by the company found that seven airlines’ terms and conditions found examples of carriers 'blacklisting' passengers, charging extortionate fees, making misleading claims about compensation and 'riding roughshod' over consumer rights.
READ MORE — Spain holiday warning as Scots face fines for swimming in sea after drinking
A failing of travel regulation has seen some airlines “seemingly ignoring their legal obligations” to help passengers with rerouting and rebooking, while other holidaymakers have struggled to get refunds.
Which? policy and advocacy director Rocio Concha said: “Consumer rights and laws are meaningless if they are not enforced. Our analysis shows some airlines are routinely ignoring their legal obligations and ripping off their customers, with little fear of facing any consequences.
“Passengers have suffered for too long due to a lack of accountability and weak enforcement of the rules. The immense disruption of recent weeks can be a watershed moment and used as a springboard to reform the industry for their benefit.
“The government must take action to restore consumer confidence in travel. That should start with a consumer-focused code of conduct all airlines must adhere to, and stronger powers for the CAA, including the ability to fine operators directly when they break the rules.”
In response, the CAA said: “We thank Which? for its continued engagement regarding contract terms and airlines. We will review its latest evidence thoroughly and will respond accordingly. We have regularly called for stronger consumer powers, including the ability to impose fines on airlines. This would allow us to take faster action when appropriate and bring our powers in line with other sectoral regulators.”
Ryanair denied that its terms and conditions mischaracterised passengers’ rights to compensation and said passengers could get more information on their rights by clicking on dedicated links within the terms. It also said it doesn’t charge large fees and that airlines have the commercial freedom to set fees as they see fit.
British Airways insisted that its terms and conditions are easily accessible, written in plain English and are kept under review. "We take unfounded and unsupported allegations very seriously, and we discourage Which? from making them. We always seek to meet our legal obligations and when a customer’s flight is cancelled or disrupted, we provide the relevant information to fully inform them of their rights,” the airline said.
Tui said: “The travel industry is heavily regulated and we therefore would be unable to operate unless we complied with the laws of England and Wales and the laws of other applicable jurisdictions. We review our conditions of carriage on a regular basis with a key focus on both the law and what is most important for our customers. Ongoing internal reviews of the language used in our terms and conditions are a part of this.”
READ MORE —
- Cheapest Glasgow Airport July flights for under £40 including Belgium and Spain
- DWP benefit cap may increase for first time in six years amid soaring inflation
- Scottish independence referendum explained as date set for vote
- Olivia Rodrigo at O2 Academy Glasgow — everything you need to know ahead of Sour Tour show
- Janey Godley reveals she is cancer free and thanks NHS for 'saving her life'
