Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
National
Tara Cosoleto

Tom Silvagni claims rape trial judge made mistakes

Tom Silvagni claims his rape convictions should be quashed because of errors by the trial judge. (Joel Carrett/AAP PHOTOS)

Tom Silvagni will argue his two rape convictions should be quashed because a judge made errors during his trial.

The youngest son of AFL great Stephen Silvagni and television personality Jo Silvagni lodged an application for leave to appeal in the Victorian Court of Appeal on January 9 but only released to the media on Thursday. 

The document claims Judge Gregory Lyon made errors during Silvagni's County Court trial, which led to a jury finding him guilty of two counts of rape in December. 

Tom Silvagni court sketch (file)
A County Court jury found Tom Silvagni guilty of two counts of rape. (Anita Lester/AAP PHOTOS)

Silvagni had denied he digitally raped the woman - known under the pseudonym Samantha Taylor - at his Melbourne home in the early hours of January 14, 2024.

The jury was told Ms Taylor had consensual sex with Silvagni's friend Anthony LoGiudice at the house but then he organised an Uber and left the property shortly before 2am. 

Silvagni then lied, telling Ms Taylor that Mr LoGiudice would be returning upstairs because his Uber had been cancelled.

But it was Silvagni who went into the dark bedroom a short time later and pretended to be Mr LoGiudice before digitally raping Ms Taylor twice. 

In the days that followed, Silvagni fabricated an Uber receipt to make it look like Mr LoGiudice had left his home after 2.30am.

He also had a pre-recorded phone call with Ms Taylor where he maintained his claims that it was Mr LoGiudice in the room and said she should drop the case. 

Silvagni's lawyers have argued the judge's first mistake was allowing the jury to consider the pre-recorded phone call as evidence of incriminating conduct. 

Incriminating conduct is actions or statements made by an accused after an alleged crime that suggest guilt.

The judge also wrongly gave jurors directions about how they should use incriminating conduct in their deliberations, the grounds of appeal state. 

Silvagni is seeking to have his appeal against the two rape convictions heard in an oral hearing, although a date is yet to be set. 

He has not lodged an appeal against his jail term of six years and two months. 

The 23-year-old will be eligible for parole after three years and three months.

Silvagni's parents had previously flagged the appeal, telling reporters their son maintained his innocence and would clear his name.

1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732)

National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.