In a recent development that has sparked concerns over due process, a decision made by a Secretary of State regarding a ballot issue could potentially reach the Supreme Court without going through the proper judicial system. Critics argue that this raises questions about fairness and the lack of a uniform standard across different states.
The decision, made by the Secretary of State who is not a lawyer, is said to have relied heavily on the ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court. As a result, the case is now pending review at the Supreme Court, with many speculating that the justices will take it up. The crux of the matter lies in the need for a consistent interpretation of the Constitution, particularly with regard to the disqualification clause and who is eligible to run for the presidency.
At the heart of the concern is the concept of due process, a cornerstone of the Constitution. Some argue that it is alarming to witness a non-lawyer Secretary of State labeling individuals as insurrectionists or murderers without any charge or conviction. Specifically, criticism has been directed at the finger-pointing towards former President Donald Trump, who has not faced any charges or convictions related to being an insurrectionist, yet finds himself being denied a place on the ballot.
Moreover, it is worth noting that during the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump, the Senate acquitted him of the charge of incitement to insurrection. Additionally, the special counsel in Washington, D.C., Jack Smith, who examined the events surrounding January 6th, declined to bring an insurrection charge against Trump. This raises the question of how Secretary of States across various states can hold trials and pronounce judgments on Trump's alleged insurrectionist role while the federal government has not done so.
Transitioning to a different topic, the ongoing impeachment inquiry surrounding President Joe Biden has taken a new turn. Republicans are now pointing to an incident where Hunter Biden defied a subpoena, claiming that Joe Biden was aware of his son's intention. Press secretary statements from the White House seem to support the fact that the President was informed about Hunter Biden's decision. Republicans are now suggesting that this could be grounds for impeachment, as it could be viewed as obstruction of justice.
If it is proven that President Biden knew of Hunter Biden's plans to defy the subpoena and made assurances to protect him from prosecution, it could potentially constitute obstruction and become a legitimate basis for impeachment proceedings.
As these legal matters continue to unfold, the nation waits with bated breath to see how these allegations will be addressed and whether they will have significant implications for the individuals involved.
