Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Sport
Giles Richards at Imola

Raising F1 budget cap would ‘tilt playing field’, claims Alpine team chief

Alpine are in fifth place in the championship with a solid car.
Alpine are in fifth place in the championship with a solid car. Photograph: Mark Thompson/Getty Images

The efforts of Formula One’s biggest teams to raise the sport’s budget cap are an attempt to claw back an unfair advantage and indicative of poor planning, according to the Alpine team principal, Otmar Szafnauer.

With the cap intended to level the playing field, Szafnauer said teams are using claims of inflationary pressure as a smokescreen to spend more looking for performance and that he and others will attempt to prevent any regulation change.

F1 introduced a budget cap for the first time in 2021. It was set at $145m and this year dropped to $140m. It is due to decrease to £135m next year. The measure was seen as vital to control ever spiralling costs and close the performance differential between the big three, Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull, and the rest of the field.

The process was difficult for the major teams, who had to let staff go and adapt to operating without an ability to merely throw money at problems. It was welcomed by the midfield teams who in most cases were already spending below the cap. This season, however, there has been a vociferous call to raise the cap to $147m, which Szafnauer maintains is evidence the system is working.

“If it wasn’t going in the right direction the big teams now wouldn’t be crying to increase it,” he said. “It’s ironic that once the season is under way and the relative performances of the cars are known, people want to increase the budget cap.”

The argument being made in favour of increasing spending is that global inflationary pressure has increased costs in areas such as logistics and freight. Szafnauer said potential inflation issues were well known in December when budgets are decided. He contends they would have planned for those pressures and that teams were once more seeking a performance advantage or to spend to solve issues with their cars.

Red Bull and Mercedes have had trouble with their cars this season.
Red Bull and Mercedes have had trouble with their cars this season. Photograph: TPN/Formula 1/Getty Images

“It’s just another excuse to raise it again,” he said. “It’s probably 80% a smokescreen and 20% that they were unable to predict the inflation would be this big.

“If everybody learns the cap is not going to be increased, they stop lobbying for it and they actually plan better.”

Significantly, McLaren and Aston Martin, previously strong backers of the budget cap, are understood to now support raising it, but both have underperforming cars this season. Alpine, by contrast, are in fifth place in the championship with a solid car that has considerable potential. Szafnauer believes it would be fundamentally unfair to punish teams who have ensured they are within the rules.

“We planned for this and made decisions that are irreversible,” he said. “We have done a good job, so I can’t support increasing the cap because others haven’t. It would definitely tilt the playing field and favour those who took risks we didn’t take.”

Haas and Alfa Romeo are also understood to oppose the change, both teams with cars that have been impressive in the opening rounds. The issue will probably be discussed at a meeting of the F1 commission on Tuesday. To change the regulations would require a supermajority of eight of the 10 teams.

Ferrari, meanwhile, have extended their contract with driver Carlos Sainz to the end of 2024, the team announced in Imola. The Spaniard is third in the championship.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.