Ministers did not understand their own Covid lockdown rules, causing confusion and 'huge resentment' among the police charged with enforcing them, a former GMP chief has said. Police forces across the UK were criticised for their sometimes heavy-handed approach to enforcing lockdown rules, including using drones to monitor people going for a walk in the Peak District and breaking up a child's birthday party in Salford.
Speaking after the latest tranche of Matt Hancock's leaked messages showed he discussed the need to 'get heavy' with the police over enforcing measures, former GMP Chief Constable Sir Peter Fahy said the comments showed how difficult it was for officers to police lockdowns. An exchange from August 2020 published by the Daily Telegraph revealed how the then-health secretary and Cabinet Secretary Simon Case feared officers were not doing enough to prevent people from breaking the rules.
Read more:
Mr Hancock also messaged Mr Case the following January to inform him that the 'PM was in vg shape' and that 'the plod got their marching orders'. Sir Peter told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think lots of people in the police service won't be surprised at the tone of these remarks.
"There was this constant confusion between what was legislation and what was guidance. Often it seemed ministers themselves didn’t understand the impact of the legislation."
He said it caused 'huge resentment within policing' when cases of officers 'trying to do their best' were 'highlighted and misunderstood'. The correspondence highlighted by the newspaper showed Mr Case asking: “Who actually is delivering enforcement?”
Mr Hancock replied 'I think we are going to have to get heavy with the police'. For Labour, shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said the exchanges revealed the 'arrogance and shameful lack of respect' of ministers towards the police.
"At the same time as they were flagrantly breaking the law themselves with their lockdown parties, they were demanding stronger enforcement by the police on everyone else," she said.
The exchanges were among more than 100,000 messages passed to the Telegraph by the journalist Isabel Oakeshott. She was originally given the material by Mr Hancock while they were collaborating on his memoir of his time in government during the pandemic.
Mr Hancock has condemned the leak as a 'massive betrayal' designed to support an 'anti-lockdown agenda'. But Ms Oakeshott brushed off the question of betrayal, reiterating her argument that the release was in the public interest.
"People can decide for themselves which is more important," she told Good Morning Britain.
"Is it more important for me, a journalist, to protect the blushes and reputation of self-interested politicians, all of whom are by the way hiring lawyers to protect their interests during this public inquiry? Or is it more important for me to reveal information that affected every single one of us – that is where I think my duty is in this case."
READ NEXT:
- Arena bomber's family 'holds significant responsibility' for his radicalisation, while Islamic State 'poster boys' encouraged him, public inquiry finds
- MI5 missed 'significant opportunity' to take action which might have prevented Manchester Arena bombing, inquiry finds
- Leaders of Didsbury Mosque attended by Arena bomber guilty of 'wilful blindness' to highly-charged debate about Libya conflict before atrocity, inquiry finds
- 'We saw staff laughing at the people they were supposed to be looking after': Inspectors' worry after shocking visit to mental health hospital
- Staff shortages cause birth centre and ward closures - how inspectors found maternity services had 'deteriorated' at one hospital
