
In an exclusive interview, An Business operations & Analytics leader challenges the replacement narrative and makes the case for workforce development over cost-cutting.
IBT: Goldman Sachs warns 300 million jobs could vanish to AI¹. Wall Street banks plan to eliminate 200,000 roles in the next few years¹. Stanford research shows early-career workers already facing a 13% employment decline in AI-exposed fields². Yet you're arguing the "push for cost savings and human replacement is overblown." What makes you so confident?