The U.S. House of Representatives has voted to formally launch an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden. The decision has sparked wide-ranging reactions on Capitol Hill, especially in conversations surrounding Congressman Jim Jordan. Jordan had previously defied a congressional subpoena – a situation that mirrors Hunter Biden's current dilemma, with the House now set to target him.
Despite criticism for defying the January 6th Select Committee subpoena during the previous Congress, Jordan is now intent on holding Hunter Biden in contempt for disregarding a similar subpoena. Under the inquiry, Biden was required to appear before the committee behind closed doors to be deposed. This is part of their ongoing impeachment investigation into President Biden.
When questioned about his prior refusal to comply with a subpoena, Jordan contested the claim, stating he had instead challenged the subpoena through a letter to the committee. However, the committee never responded. As of now, Jordan is actively participating in the closed-door deposition of a former assistant U.S. attorney involved in the investigation into Hunter Biden.
The committee's goal is to establish a connection between President Biden and his son, Hunter. Once established, it could pave the way for impeachment articles against the president. However, even some Republicans acknowledge they lack sufficient proof at the moment.
Despite mixed sentiments, some conservatives believe they should push for impeachment, regardless of the potential political backlash if the impeachment attempt against Joe Biden fails. Certain Republicans fear that reluctance to initiate impeachment proceedings might lead to loss of support from a significant portion of the American population.
However, many are skeptical about the suitability of impeachment given the country’s current issues. The mere idea is seen to fuel further political discord. Legislators in swing districts are particularly hesitant about the political impact.
There is no clarity yet on the ongoing investigation; however, the House Speaker will eventually need to decide whether to proceed with impeachment articles. The decision will hinge on firm evidence and the likelihood of securing votes. With this verdict, the House Session ended for the year, leaving everyone in anticipation for what lies ahead in the next Session. The key point remains; without substantial evidence, the case for impeachment remains weak.
