A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction barring the NCAA from enforcing its rules that prohibit name, image, and likeness compensation from being used to recruit athletes. The injunction was granted in response to a request from the states of Tennessee and Virginia, dealing a significant blow to the NCAA's authority in governing college sports.
The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Clifton Corker in the Eastern District of Tennessee, challenges a long-standing principle of the NCAA's amateurism model, which prohibits third parties from paying recruits to attend specific schools.
According to Corker, the NCAA's prohibition likely violates federal antitrust law and harms student-athletes. The plaintiffs argued that since the NCAA lifted its ban on athletes profiting from their fame in 2021, recruits have been considering name, image, and likeness opportunities when choosing a school.
Corker dismissed the NCAA's argument that allowing NIL collectives to offer deals to recruits would blur the line between college athletics and professional sports. He stated that the NCAA failed to provide convincing procompetitive rationales for maintaining the recruiting ban.
The judge highlighted that the NCAA's rules linking deals to athletic performance, which were not challenged in the lawsuit, may be more effective in preserving amateurism than the NIL-recruiting ban.
The lawsuit was filed by the attorneys general of Tennessee and Virginia in January, following revelations of a potential NCAA investigation into the University of Tennessee for NIL rule violations. While a temporary restraining order was initially denied, Corker indicated that the states are likely to succeed in their case in the long run.
Tennessee's Attorney General emphasized that the injunction protects athlete rights from the NCAA's alleged illegal NIL-recruitment ban and vowed to continue fighting against the association's practices.
The decision also benefits the University of Tennessee, which has faced scrutiny over alleged recruiting violations related to NIL deals. The school's chancellor criticized the NCAA's pursuit of infractions cases involving NIL rules, calling it 'intellectually dishonest.'
The NCAA's authority to regulate athlete compensation has faced challenges from various fronts, including a recent ruling that members of the Dartmouth men's basketball team are employees of the school and can unionize. The NCAA is currently defending multiple antitrust lawsuits while seeking congressional antitrust protections.
For more college football news, visit AP college football.
