Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
USA Today Sports Media Group
USA Today Sports Media Group
Sport
Chris Roling

Examining a myth about Orlando Brown’s Bengals contract

After Orlando Brown signed with the Cincinnati Bengals, the idea went around in places such as Twitter that he took a big loss compared to an extension offer from the Kansas City Chiefs he turned down.

That extension Brown left on the table with the Chiefs was reported as a six-year deal worth $139 million.

With the Bengals, he inked a deal worth $64 million over four years with an immediate $31 million signing bonus.

At face value, that obviously looks like a big disparity. But things are never so simple at face value and especially when it comes to NFL contracts.

Spotrac provided some insight:

Over the span of 2022-24, when including a tag, Brown makes more money with the Bengals than he would have with the Chiefs. Only the first three of six years with the Chiefs were guaranteed anyway. After roughly two seasons with the Bengals, he enters prime extension territory again or eventually hits free agency — before turning 30, netting him one more big payday.

As other players have shown recently, a shorter deal can be much more lucrative than a long-term one. Brown is the latest example and overreactions about his contract situation were a tad premature.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.