Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
PTI

Delhi Excise policy case | Kejriwal moves SC against HC order denying him protection from coercive action

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on March 21 moved the Supreme Court against the high court’s order denying him protection from coercive action in an excise policy-linked money laundering case, sources said.

The move came hours after the Delhi High Court refused to grant him any interim protection.

Earlier in the day, a Bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Manoj Jain listed the AAP leader’s application seeking protection for further consideration on April 22 when his main petition challenging the summons is fixed for hearing.

Also Read | Arvind Kejriwal moves Delhi High Court challenging ED summons in money-laundering case

“We have heard both sides and we are not inclined at this stage [to grant protection]. The respondent is at liberty to file reply,” the Bench said.

The application for interim relief forms part of Mr. Kejriwal’s petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED’s) summonses issued to him for questioning.

Mr. Kejriwal has moved the court in the wake of the latest summons, the ninth issued by the ED, asking him to appear before it on March 21.

During the hearing, the senior counsel for the AAP chief also sought deferment of the summons issued for today.

“It is already over. Time is over. He is not attending,” Additional Solicitor General S.V. Raju, appearing for the ED, said.

Also Read | Delhi excise scam case | Arvind Kejriwal moves sessions court challenging summons issued to him on ED complaint

Mr. Kejriwal has repeatedly refused to appear before the federal anti-money laundering agency, calling the summonses illegal.

The case pertains to alleged corruption and money laundering while formulating and executing the Delhi Government’s excise policy for 2021-22, which was later scrapped.

AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Sanjay Singh are in judicial custody in the case.

Mr. Kejriwal’s name has been mentioned multiple times in the charge sheets filed by the ED. The agency has alleged that the other accused were in touch with Mr. Kejriwal for formulating the excise policy that resulted in undue benefits to them in return for which they paid kickbacks to the AAP.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.