Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Hindu
The Hindu
National
Aaratrika Bhaumik

‘Censorship’ or ‘right to authentic information’?: The Bombay HC’s split verdict on Centre’s Fact-Check Unit | Explained

A division bench of the Bombay High Court on January 31 delivered a split verdict on petitions challenging the constitutionality of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Amendment Rules, 2023 (IT Rules) that permit a “Fact Check Unit” (FCU) of the Union Government to identify “fake or false or misleading” online content “related to the business of the Central Government” and demand its removal.

While Justice G.S. Patel observed that the amendment promoted censorship and violated a host of fundamental rights, Justice Neela Gokhale was of the opinion that it did not prohibit any critical opinion of the government and was therefore not a disproportionate measure.

Also Read: The Bombay High Court’s concerns regarding the Centre’s Fact-Check Unit | Explained

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.