From Skadden Arps filing in N.Z. v. Fenix Int'l Ltd. last week, involving a class action against OnlyFans:
Plaintiffs' Opposition … cites 18 cases in attempting to argue that the Court should decline to partially reconsider its FNC [forum non conveniens] Order, or certify an interlocutory appeal, in response to the California Supreme Court's recent decision in EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court (Cal. 2025). As discussed in detail below and in the accompanying Declaration of Or-el S. Vaknin, Plaintiffs attributed false, AI-hallucinated quotations or holdings to at least 11 of those cases. This is the third distinct filing over a monthlong period in which Plaintiffs have used non-existent quotations to attempt to defeat Fenix's requests for relief. This pattern of submitting false, AI-generated law is an "abuse of the judicial system" that harasses Fenix and wastes the Court's time and resources. It must be stopped. The Court should disregard Plaintiffs' latest tainted efforts and grant the Motion.
And another filing:
