Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Inverse
Inverse
Entertainment
Ryan Britt

95 Years Ago, A Horror Movie Masterpiece Triumphed Over An Obvious Shortcoming

John Kobal Foundation/Moviepix/Getty Images

On Valentine’s Day in 1931, the hottest date was easily the just-released Universal Studios movie, Dracula. Starring Bela Lugosi in the titular role, Dracula recontextualized the literary character for modern audiences, redefined the notion of the vampire as an anti-hero, and, along with Frankenstein in the autumn of the same year, firmly established what we think of as “Universal Monsters” forever.

But Dracula did all of that with one cinematic hand tied behind its back. Despite its impressive scope and budget for its time, Dracula did not have an original film score in 1931, meaning that when it was released, only the opening titles contained music, and that music wasn’t even composed for the film. (It was a selection from Swan Lake, which the 1932 version of The Mummy later reused as well.) So, despite being the first “talkie” motion picture adaptation of the 1897 Bram Stoker novel, Dracula lacks a musical score. Here’s why it was amazing anyway, and why the 1998 retroactive 1998 score from Philip Glass is essential for any serious fan.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.