Court Leaks and Attorney-Journalists The professional-ethics implications of making court confidences public. Reason · Apr 20
"The Biggest Scandal Here Is In Fact the Leaks Themselves" The leak of internal Supreme Court memos could affect how the Court operates. Reason · Apr 20
A "Bombshell" Or a Dud? Once again, originalism is only elevated when a scholar with conservative credentials opposes conservative jurisprudence. Reason · Oct 14, 2025
What Should We Call the "Shadow Docket"? Should it be the interim docket? The emergency docket? The emergency orders docket? The short order docket? Something else? Reason · Sep 15, 2025
Welcome to the "Interim Docket" Justice Kavanaugh on what to call the "shadow docket" now that it is no longer in the shadows. Reason · Sep 5, 2025
Are We Witnessing "Appeasement"? A Reply to Steve Vladeck A defense to Steve Vladeck's critique and a brief comment on Adrian Vermeule's related op-ed in the New York Times. Reason · Aug 1, 2025
Professor Barrett Was At Home In CASA After the Supreme Court decided Trump v. CASA, the Wall Street Journal editorial page took a victory lap. The editors, who… The post Professor Barrett Was At Home In CASA appeared first on Reason.com. Reason · Jul 16, 2025
Baude on Trump v. Wilcox: "Predictable and Reasonable" A defense of the Supreme Court's decision to let President Trump remove members of the NLRB and MSPB. Reason · May 23, 2025
The Department of Justice's "Longstanding" General Practice of Intracircuit Nonacquiescence A response to questions from Justices Kagan and Barrett. Reason · May 16, 2025
Choice of Law in Takings Cases After Tyler v. Hennepin County (III) The Court’s departures from standard choice of law principles (or, takings doctrine for federal courts gurus). Reason · Jan 22, 2025
Jack Smith Explains Why He Did Not Charge Trump With Insurrection And Smith demonstrates why the Colorado Supreme Court got it wrong. Reason · Jan 14, 2025
The Unprecedented Dynamics of Trump's TikTok Brief Trump wants to make a deal so SCOTUS doesn't have to. Reason · Dec 29, 2024
Calling for the Views of the President-Elect [This post is co-authored by Will Baude and Richard Re and cross-posted at Re's Judicata.] When a new presidential administration… The post Calling for the Views of the President-Elect appeared first on Reason.com. Reason · Dec 19, 2024
A Modest Revelation About Trump v. Anderson Recent New York Times reporting about the Court's deliberations on the case modestly reinforces the view that the Court ruled that disqualification from office-holding under Section 3 requires congressional legislation. Reason · Sep 16, 2024
Reason · Aug 29, 2024 Some Thoughts on Raising the Sanity Waterline [I am happy to share this guest post from Professor Seth Barrett Tillman, which addresses some discourse on legal academia, including a recent post by Will Baude.] There has been much back-and-forth on social media and blogs lately about what constitutes good behaviour for academics. Having been in academic affrays…
Reason · Jun 21, 2024 Congratulations to Randy Barnett, Will Baude, Steve Sachs, and Keith Whittington, Whose Academic Work Was Cited in Rahimi Note particularly Keith Whittington's Originalism: A Critical Introduction, which Justice Barrett cited several times. UPDATE: The Criminal Procedure treatise on which Orin Kerr is a coauthor was cited today by Justice Jackson in Erlinger v. U.S. I didn't read that case as closely, so I missed the cite; thanks to…
Reason · Jun 7, 2024 Baude & Paulsen v. Blackman on Section 3 Video from the 2024 Originalism Works-in-Progress Conference
Reason · Feb 19, 2024 Griffin's Case (1869) and The Enforcement Act of 1870 Justice Kavanaugh was right. Chief Justice Chase's decision in Griffin's Case "forms the backdrop against which Congress" legislated The Enforcement Act of 1870.
Reason · Feb 11, 2024 Blackman & Baude & Paulsen at San Diego Originalism Works-in-Progress Conference "Some more scholars" talk about Section 3
Reason · Feb 7, 2024 Prof. Michael McConnell: "'Narrow' or 'Sweeping'—What Does Originalist Evidence Have to Say?" I'm delighted to pass along this item from Prof. McConnell (Stanford), one of the leading American originalist scholars: I most often agree with my good friends and casebook co-authors Will Baude and Michael Paulsen on matters of constitutional interpretation. But not about the attempted disqualification of Donald Trump for running…
Reason · Jan 28, 2024 Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution Their amicus brief endorses the view that members of state legislatures are officers. They took the exact opposite position in 1995 and in subsequent publications.
Reason · Jan 22, 2024 "Officer of the United States" in Context I have not been deep in the weeds of the arguments about Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, unlike my constitutional law casebook coauthors: Mike Paulsen, Michael McConnell, and Will Baude. But it is surprising to me that the former President of the United States seems to be putting most…
Reason · Jan 3, 2024 Leigh Bardugo, "The Ninth House" I read this and much enjoyed it some years ago; it's an urban fantasy set at Yale, and I expect that people with some Yale or New Haven experience would enjoy it even more. Indeed, I recommended it to Will Baude, who went to Yale Law, and he just let…
Reason · Dec 29, 2023 Natelson on the Offices and Officers of the Constitution in 1788 and 1868 "Mr. Tillman has been joined by another legal scholar, Josh Blackman. Together, they have tried to reconstruct the meanings of all these words and phrases."
Reason · Nov 13, 2023 Standing Doctrine and the Supreme Court Today the Harvard Law Review has published its issue on the Supreme Court's October 2022 Term, and Will Baude and I have a case comment on Biden v. Nebraska and more generally on standing doctrine in the term. The piece is called Proper Parties, Proper Relief. HLR case comments are…