The Latest Breaking News from the Texas Supreme Court

From Luke v. Schwartz, decided yesterday by Judge Robert Pitman (W.D. Tex.); of course, as usual, keep in mind that at this stage of the lawsuit these are only allegations: Plaintiff David Luke … alleges the following facts …. Luke dated [defendant Jeffrey] Schwartz's daughter, Emma Schwartz …, … while…

Doctors, lawyers and advocates say the state board’s new guidance still doesn’t clarify when doctors can legally perform abortions.

The Texas Supreme Court is considering taking up the question of whether frozen embryos should be treated as people, not property, in a divorce case.

Jonathan Mitchell has filed at least nine petitions seeking information from abortion activists, doctors and women. None have resulted in a deposition.

The proposed guidance from the Texas Medical Board would require doctors to document whether there was time to transfer a patient “by any means available” to avoid performing an abortion.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is challenging the program, saying it violates the Texas Constitution.

Justice John Devine’s comments at a conservative event are the latest to prompt concerns about his impartiality as a jurist.

Three incumbent judges with nearly a century of criminal law experience fell victim to Paxton’s political revenge tour after they ruled against the attorney general in a 2021 voter fraud case.

John Devine, a former anti-abortion activist who has leaned on his deeply conservative politics, caught on tape

Devine, a former anti-abortion activist, faces a heated primary challenge that has focused on questions about his ethics.

House Representative Harold Dutton Jr. stands behind the state takeover of the district. Can he survive another reelection after its fallout?