Gordon S. Wood Weighs in on Akhil Reed Amar's Born Equal: Remaking America's Constitution, 1840-1920 Praise from Wood for what I think is the best new book this year. Reason · Oct 5, 2025
"Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash" A reply to Prof. Kurt Lash's response to the brief by Profs. Akhil Amar & Vikram Amar. Reason · Feb 8, 2024
Trump v. Anderson, Professor Akhil Reed Amar, and the Constitutionality of the Presidential Succession Act Professor Amar's argument renders the presidential succession acts of 1792 and 1947 unconstitutional by barring putting the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Temper of the Senate in the line of succession to the presidency Reason · Feb 8, 2024
Section Three and the "First Insurrection" … That Wasn't [Prof. Kurt Lash (Richmond), who is a leading legal historian of the Fourteenth Amendment, was kind enough to pass along this response to an amicus brief by Profs. Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. Anderson, and I'm delighted to have it published here. As… Reason · Jan 29, 2024
Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar Retreat From Their "Global" Rule for the "Offices" and "Officers" of the Constitution Their amicus brief endorses the view that members of state legislatures are officers. They took the exact opposite position in 1995 and in subsequent publications. Reason · Jan 28, 2024
Nikki Haley and Donald Trump George H.W. Bush ended his 1980 presidential primary campaign on May 26, 1980 Reason · Jan 25, 2024
The Amar Brief in Moore Should Not Be Embraced: Part 2 Oral Argument in Moore v. United States will be held on Tuesday. Must taxes on unrealized gains (crucial for a future wealth tax) be apportioned equally among the states? Reason · Dec 3, 2023
Calabresi: The Amar Brief in Moore v. United States Should Not be Embraced Is a Federal Wealth Tax a Direct Tax? Steven Calabresi Responds to the Amar Amicus Brief in Moore. Reason · Nov 16, 2023
Donald Trump Should be on the Ballot and Should Lose In a prior blog post, I argued that Donald Trump should be kept off the ballot for the 2024 presidential election because of the Insurrection Clause of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. I have now changed my mind and have concluded that since Trump was not "an officer of… Reason · Sep 16, 2023
Professor Akhil Amar, On His Podcast, Responds to Attorney General Mukasey and the Tillman-Blackman Position Section 3 civility outside and inside Yale Law School. Reason · Sep 14, 2023
A controversial election theory at the Supreme Court is tied to a disputed document The reliability of a document by one of the U.S. Constitution's framers has long been under serious doubt. North Carolina Republicans cited it in a case that could upend election laws. WEKU · Nov 3, 2022
Justice Alito mocks foreign critics of abortion reversal Justice Samuel Alito mocked foreign leaders’ criticism of the Supreme Court decision he authored overturning a constitutional right to abortion, in his first public comments since last month’s ruling The Independent UK · Jul 29, 2022