Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Conversation
The Conversation
Katharine Gelber, Deputy Executive Dean and Associate Dean (Academic), Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, The University of Queensland

Writers and artists are often politically outspoken – but when should we view an opinion or artwork as genuinely harmful?

Within public debate around free speech and its limits there has long been a view that artistic expression deserves especially rigorous protection. This is because it is a medium of indirect communication, open to multiple interpretations. There is a long tradition of art being used to critique society and politics.

Artists themselves are aware of the robust protection they require in order to produce their works. Many feel a responsibility to use their work and their platforms to raise awareness of voices and perspectives outside the mainstream. Writers and artists often critique their societies and seek to provoke.

This issue has again arisen, following the recent decision by Creative Australia to rescind the contract of artist Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael D'Agostino, after the funding body had chosen Sabsabi to represent Australia at the 2026 Venice Biennale.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.