Wisconsin Republicans are seeking to limit the governor's authority to unilaterally spend federal funds, a response to the significant influx of money into the state during the COVID-19 pandemic. Democratic Gov. Tony Evers utilized much of the federal aid at his discretion, directing a majority towards small businesses and economic development, which sparked discontent among Republicans who argued for legislative oversight.
Two related constitutional amendments are set for voter approval in the upcoming Aug. 13 primary election. If passed, these amendments would impact not only Evers but all future governors, covering federal funds that arrive without specific spending directives, typically in response to emergencies or disasters.
Opponents of the amendments, including Democrats and various advocacy groups, view them as a legislative power grab that could hinder governors' ability to swiftly respond to future crises. Conversely, supporters argue that the changes would enhance accountability, efficiency, and transparency in government.
Wisconsin Republicans have increasingly turned to constitutional amendments as a means to bypass Evers' vetoes, with voters previously approving amendments related to election funding and voter eligibility. The current effort to restrict the governor's spending authority comes amidst ongoing disputes between Republicans and Evers over legislative powers.
The amendments aim to address concerns raised during the COVID-19 pandemic when Wisconsin received $5.7 billion in federal aid, with only a fraction subject to spending restrictions. The proposed changes would require legislative approval for the governor to spend federal funds and prevent the delegation of spending decisions by the Legislature.
If ratified, the Legislature could establish guidelines for handling federal funds, allowing for flexibility based on the governor in office or the purpose of the money. Notable opponents of the amendments include voting rights groups, the Wisconsin Democratic Party, and various liberal organizations, while support has been voiced by business lobbying groups and conservative think tanks.
