Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Tribune News Service
Tribune News Service
National
Martha Ross

Why Weinstein’s team risked vilifying Jennifer Siebel Newsom and other accusers in post-#MeToo trial

To the very end of Harvey Weinstein’s rape trial in Los Angeles, his defense team lawyers didn’t let up on their efforts to malign and “slut shame” Jennifer Siebel Newsom and the other accusers, arguing that these women falsely accused the producer of assault because they were embarrassed they had “transactional sex” with him to advance their careers.

During opening statements, one of Weinstein’s attorneys’ said that Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wife would just be “another bimbo” who slept with the former movie magnate “to get ahead” if she didn’t enjoy her current political profile. This combative strategy didn’t let up in closing arguments Thursday, according to reports, with another of Weinstein’s attorneys disdainfully characterizing the women who testified against him as “fame and fortune seekers.”

According to defense attorney Alan Jackson, Siebel Newsom in particular was “theatrical” and “overly dramatized” in her testimony about her alleged 2005 attack by Weinstein in a Beverly Hills hotel, the Daily Beast reported. California’s first partner, a documentary filmmaker and once aspiring film and TV actor, couldn’t “square away” the fact that she had consensual sex with him.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.