Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
AAP
AAP
Environment
Tracey Ferrier

Unburnt wildlife refuge to be sacrificed for homes

A NSW South Coast community has fought for years to block the proposed housing development. (Dean Lewins/AAP PHOTOS)

The NSW government is under pressure to reconsider a housing development that will flatten a wildlife refuge that was spared in the Black Summer bushfires.

Federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has just approved a 153-home estate that will clear most of a mature forest on the NSW South Coast.

The site at Manyana covers about 20 hectares and is documented habitat for a range of native species, including grey-headed flying foxes, which are vulnerable to extinction.

Ariel view of the bushland which is set to be cleared
The critically endangered Swift Parrot was recently spotted on the development site. (Dean Lewins/AAP PHOTOS)

In recent weeks, the critically endangered Swift Parrot - one of Australia's rarest animals - was also spotted on the development site by a trained ecologist.

The Manyana community has fought for years to defeat the Ozy Homes development.

With federal approval now in place, the Manyana Matters Environmental Association wants the NSW government to reassess the project, saying too much has changed since state approvals were granted in 2008.

They have support from the Greens, who warn a string of approved but long-dormant developments could jeopardise threatened species living in habitat in coastal NSW.

A barricade at the entrance to unburnt bushland at manyana
Opponents of the housing development say 17 of the 20 hectare site will be lost. (Dean Lewins/AAP PHOTOS)

The federal approval rejects one stage of the Ozy Homes development but says the rest can proceed under almost 40 conditions meant to curb or offset environmental harms.

Conditions include limiting clearing of grey-headed flying fox habitat to 1.25 hectares, and planting food trees.

But opponents say 17 of the roughly 20 hectare site will be lost and some of the conditions are absurd.

One requires the protection of a patch of littoral rainforest - a critically endangered type of ecosystem. But another says some of it can go in order to satisfy NSW laws requiring bushfire protection zones around homes.

"On one hand they are saying this rainforest is so important it must be protected, but on the other they're saying 'if it's going to pose a bushfire risk to the houses you can chop it down'," Manyana Matters president Bill Eger said.

As locals hold nightly vigils at the site, Ms Plibersek has written to NSW Planning Minister Paul Scully.

In the letter, she says she lacks the power to weigh in on whether the site is an appropriate place for 153 new homes, but it might be something for NSW to consider.

However, Mr Scully and the Shoalhaven City Council are now warring over who, if anyone, should reconsider the development.

A local at a barricade blocking the entrance to bushland
Local residents are holding nightly vigils at the site. (Dean Lewins/AAP PHOTOS)

Mr Scully says a parliamentary committee is looking at so-called zombie development applications - a catch all term for dormant projects approved years ago.

But he says councils have long had powers to deal with such circumstances, including the opportunity to withdraw development applications.

"If they choose not to exercise that capacity that's a question that should go to those individual councils," he told the ABC.

But outgoing Shoalhaven Mayor Amanda Findley says the council has been looking to the NSW government for leadership.

"I'm astonished because he knows that the ultimate power in NSW is the state government, and the state government can do this with the stroke of a pen," she told the broadcaster.

"They can take over land, they can turn it back to forest, they can give it a conservation zoning at any point in time without councils being involved."

Australian National University's David Lindenmayer, a leading expert in forest ecology, says the Manyana project is the latest example of the environment suffering death by a thousand cuts.

He can't reconcile the federal government spending cash to help imperilled species while simultaneously greenlighting projects that will destroy mature, intact habitat.

The minister's office says the government has to make decisions in accordance with the facts and national environment laws.

"That's what happens on every project, and that's what's happened here."

Ozy Homes did not respond to AAP's request for comment.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.