Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Josh Blackman

Unanimous Supreme Court Adopts the Sword-Shield Dichotomy To Explain How Constitutional Rights Can Be Litigated

[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman].

On April 16, 2024, the Supreme Court decided DeVillier v. Texas. The question presented was whether "a person whose property is taken without compensation [may] seek redress under the self-executing Takings Clause even if the legislature has not affirmatively provided them with a cause of action." However, the Court did not need to answer that question because "Texas law provides a cause of action that allows property owners to vindicate their rights under the Takings Clause." The Court unanimously ruled that DeVillier's claims could "proceed under Texas' state-law cause of action."

Justice Thomas wrote the unanimous opinion for the Court. Thomas provided a brief summary of how constitution rights can be litigated in federal court:

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.