Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Reason
Reason
Politics
Jacob Sullum

Trump's Rationale for His New Tariffs Contradicts the Position He Took Before His Supreme Court Defeat

Shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not empower the president to impose tariffs, the Trump administration invoked one of several statutes that do explicitly authorize import taxes: Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. In a proclamation issued on Friday, President Donald Trump relied on that provision to impose "a temporary import surcharge of 10 percent." In a Truth Social post the next day, he raised that "surcharge" to 15 percent, the maximum rate allowed by Section 122.

The official rationale for this use of Section 122 contradicts the position that the government's lawyers took while defending Trump's interpretation of IEEPA. Before the Supreme Court rejected his reading of that law in Learning Resources v. Trump, the administration argued that Section 122 was an inadequate substitute because it addressed just one aspect of the concerns that led Trump to declare a "national emergency" involving the supposedly "unusual and extraordinary threat" posed by the longstanding U.S. trade deficit in goods. Now the White House has recharacterized those concerns to justify Trump's invocation of Section 122.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.