Donald Trump received major boost ahead of mid-term elections 2026 as the US Supreme Court on Friday granted a U.S President administration request to allow the use of a federal database to weed out potential non-citizens from the voter rolls. A majority of the nine justices on the top court joined the unsigned opinion, providing a victory to President Donald Trump ahead of the November mid-term elections. The three liberal justices on the conservative-dominated court dissented.
Friday's Supreme Court decision lifted a lower court order that had blocked the use of a Department of Homeland Security program known as Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) to verify the citizenship of individuals on the voter rolls.
Impact on Mid-Term Elections 2026
The emergency order allows states, for now, to use the Trump administration's revamped version of a Department of Homeland Security program, called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, in their efforts to verify the eligibility of voters on their rolls. It's a program that has drawn scrutiny for its use of voters' sensitive personal data and its tendency to wrongly flag some eligible voters as noncitizens.
States' use of the SAVE program is voluntary, limiting the ruling's impact on the midterm elections. Existing law also blocks most states from systematically purging voters from their rolls within 90 days of an election, said David Becker, an election law expert who leads the Center for Election Innovation and Research. He said DHS itself has admitted the data is not perfect.
Citizenship Status Ahead of U.S. Mid-Term Elections
SAVE is used to identify citizenship status to determine whether someone is eligible for benefits.
In its ruling, the Supreme Court said the federal government "has an obligation to respond to requests from state and local election officials seeking to verify the citizenship of voters." The lower court order blocking the use of SAVE "prevents the Federal Government from using the program it believes is best suited to the task."
Election experts said the ruling is unlikely to have a major impact on the November elections because most US states ban purges of voters 90 days ahead of an election.
"Both the majority and dissent agree that this case is likely to have limited impact on the midterms," Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, said in a blog post. "Compared to the recent mail-in voting case, this one is not very important substantively."
Hasen was referring to a Supreme Court decision earlier this month that blocked a Trump plan that would have restricted the use of mail-in ballots. Trump reacted furiously to that ruling calling it "horrible" and "highly political" in a Truth Social post.
