Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Conversation
The Conversation
Nicholas A. R. Fraser, Senior Research Associate , Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto

Trading rights for efficiency: Why Bill C-12’s restrictive asylum measures will likely backfire

Almost a year ago, Canadian voters elected a government that promised a fundamental shift toward pragmatism. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s mandate was clear: achieve sustainable immigration levels and ensure that “government itself must become much more productive … by focusing on results over spending.”

But since Parliament passed Bill C-12 — the Strengthening Canada’s Immigration System and Borders Act — the government is at risk of violating its own evidence-based pledge.

While others have rightly commented on the human rights concerns (and there are many) raised by this legislation — including those on the United Nations Human Rights Committee — the argument that sacrificing immigrants’ rights will enhance administrative capacity is a bold claim worth investigating.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.