Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
PC Gamer
PC Gamer
Andy Edser

'They chewed me up pretty good': A US plaintiff attempted to use an AI avatar to argue their court case and the judges were far from amused

Phoenix Wright.

AI has many uses—or at least that's what we keep being told—but one area where it might do some good is helping with the notoriously complex legal process. After all, should you find yourself faced with the task of self-representation in an upcoming court case, perhaps an AI may be able to present your arguments more successfully than you. Jerome Dewald tried just that in the New York State Supreme Court last month, but the judges were far from impressed by his creative use of technology.

Dewald was representing himself as a plaintiff in an employment dispute, APNews reports, but felt that an AI avatar would deliver his opening presentation better than he could due to a tendency to mumble and trip over his words. He first attempted to generate a digital replica of himself with "a product created by a San Francisco tech company", but when he ran out of time he used a generic avatar instead.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.