Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Comment
Zoe Williams

The term ‘Blairite’ is meaningless. So why do people continue to use it?

Tony Blair in 1995, two years before his election win.
Things can only get better … Tony Blair in 1995. Photograph: Jeff Overs/BBC News & Current Affairs/Getty Images

Late last year, before Nigel Farage fell out of Elon Musk’s favour, the technology writer William Cullerne Bown asked a question that has since been rendered at least temporarily irrelevant: if it’s a problem for Musk to give Farage $100m, why is it fine for Larry Ellison to give Tony Blair $100m? Tech titan Ellison is reportedly donating huge sums to the Tony Blair Institute.

Before we even get to that question – and it’s a good one – there’s just a tiny adjustment we need to make on political vocabulary. We’ve been saying “Blairite” ever since there were two tribes, the other being “Brownite” (as in Gordon Brown). It may not have entered the dictionary until 2000, but insiders have been using Blairite for about 30 years.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.