Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
Comment
Anne Twomey

The LNP’s phrase-banning law is wide open to constitutional attack. Is it a victory for the people, or a smart political play?

Protesters wave flags and hold signs during a pro-Palestinian march in Brisbane
Protesters wave flags and hold signs during a pro-Palestinian march in Brisbane in August last year. The Queensland government has banned the use of the phrases ‘from the river to the sea’ and ‘globalise the intifada’. Photograph: Jason O’Brien/EPA

Queensland has become the first parliament in Australia to enact a ban on the use of two political slogans: “from the river to the sea” and “globalise the intifada”. But its passage, while swift, has been rocky, with last-minute alterations making the law more vulnerable to a constitutional challenge.

As originally introduced, the bill was a quite sophisticated attempt to repel any constitutional attack. The high court has previously recognised a constitutionally implied freedom of political communication, which limits the powers of the state and federal parliaments to make laws that restrict or prohibit political communication. Parliaments can only enact these laws if they have another legitimate purpose, such as protecting people from harm, and they are targeted to achieving that purpose in a way that minimises restrictions on political communication.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.