Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Fortune
Fortune
Sean Dobson

The housing paradox: why banning institutional investors could make affordability worse

trump (Credit: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

There are few issues more important in the United States than housing. It’s a crucial part of the American Dream, representing a path to security, community, and mobility. But in the attempt to make this complex challenge easier, there’s a dangerous policy idea gaining traction in Washington: restricting large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes and offering them as rentals. The proposal is cloaked in language about expanding homeownership and curbing rising housing costs.

While it may look good in a press release, this policy would be a disaster for vulnerable American families. Restricting institutional investment in high-quality single-family rentals (SFR) would limit housing options for the communities fueling America’s population growth: Black, Hispanic, and economically challenged families in their 20s and 30s. Although framed as taking on private equity, this proposal would instead represent an attack on renters, disproportionately harming underserved communities.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.