Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Comment
Editorial

The Guardian view on voter ID and turnout: critics were right about this cynical manoeuvre

A polling station during local elections on 4 May 2023 in Middlesbrough, England.
‘Most concerning is the asymmetric impact of the new rules, with a disproportionate number of people being turned away from polling stations in more deprived areas compared with affluent places.’ Photograph: Ian Forsyth/Getty Images

It should surprise no one that making it harder to vote reduces the number of votes cast. So it has proven, with the obligation to show photo ID at a polling station applied for the first time in English local elections in May. A report published on Wednesday by the Electoral Commission confirms that the new rules had a negative impact on participation, vindicating warnings that the government had said were unfounded.

Turnout was marginally lower than in comparable previous ballots and, according to the commission’s research, the ID requirement accounted for 4% of absences. That might not seem like a lot, but when extrapolated to a national ballot, it threatens to silence hundreds of thousands of voices. Local elections tend to bring out stalwart participants, who are more likely to be politically engaged enough to know about the new rules, which means it is a reasonable assumption that the suppression effect of ID would be higher in a general election.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.