Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Comment
Editorial

The Guardian view on national insurance: these taxes embody a solidarity we still need

Jeremy Hunt poses for photographs as he leaves 11 Downing Street to deliver his budget to Parliament.
‘Jeremy Hunt is very wrong to caricature NICs as a penalising or reactionary tax.’ Photograph: Xinhua/Rex/Shutterstock

Before he unveiled his main tax cut in the 2024 budget this week, Jeremy Hunt criticised the fact that Britain collects two different types of taxes on earnings: income tax and national insurance contributions (NICs). The system has become too complicated, the chancellor said. It penalises work, he added, thus deterring a high-wage, high-skill economy. He then announced a cut in employees’ NICs by a further 2p, and ended: “Our long-term ambition is to end this unfairness … we will continue to cut national insurance.”

Britain’s tax system is indisputably complicated. The case for clarifying it as far as possible is overwhelming, in part so that it can do the job required in today’s conditions, but also so that it can command the robust public support it demands, especially in populist times. But Mr Hunt is very wrong to caricature NICs as a penalising or reactionary tax. In many ways, NICs are the very opposite.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.