From the introduction and conclusion of a decision by Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui (D.D.C.) in In re: Search of One Device and Two Individuals (decided last week but just released Wednesday):
The government has moved to seal seemingly forever an order of the Court. But this is the Court's order, not the Executive's order. So the Court, not the Executive, decides unsealing. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the government's attempt to muzzle the Court….
No secret courts. This means no forever sealed judicial decisions—including warrants—as they are the foundation for secret courts. Without visibility, the public cannot hold courts or the government accountable. The Framers knew this. Thomas Jefferson said "wherever the people are well informed they can be trusted with their own government; that whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them to rights." Transparency is foundational to what makes America great.
Transparency requires courts to timely unseal—with redactions if needed—every judicial decision, including search warrants. Courts abdicate their duty to ensure transparency if they only monitor unsealing in high profile warrants.
The largely unsealed May 6 order appears to be here; here's an excerpt from the long May 29 decision justifying the unsealing (with redaction) of the order:
