Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - AU
The Guardian - AU
Comment
John Quiggin

Telstra’s triple-zero failure is a result of prioritising neoliberal ‘competition’ and reaping none of its benefits

The Telstra Discovery store on Pitt Street in Sydney
‘Telstra and Optus, the supposedly temporary duopoly established in the 1990s, still have 70% of the mobile network between them.’ Photograph: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian

Another year, another telecommunications failure. In 2025, it was Optus whose network failed, leading to hundreds of triple-zero calls failing to get through. This time, it was Telstra, with similarly chaotic results. As I pointed out last time around, outcomes like this are the inevitable result of a policy framework designed to put more priority on competition than on the reliable delivery of essential services.

The failures go right back to the policy reforms of the 1990s, still viewed through rose-coloured glasses by much of the commentariat. At the start of the process, Australia had a single telephone network run by a statutory corporation (Telecom Australia) which had delivered steady reductions in cost and expansion in services over many decades. The looming challenge was the new technology of broadband fibre and cellular mobile telephony.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.