Supreme Court Visitors Advocate Against Gender Identity Medications

A demonstrator holds a candle during a protest in Mexico City, Monday, Nov. 13, 2023. The first openly nonbinary person to assume a judicial position in Mexico was found dead in their home Monday in t

Today, at the Supreme Court, Glenna Goldis and her friend from Brooklyn, New York, expressed their views on the case, highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach to the issue at hand.

Goldis, a lesbian, emphasized her concerns about the use of certain medications on gender non-conforming individuals, stating that such treatments should not be administered to address non-medical conditions like gender non-conformity in children.

Advocates for safeguarding rights of same-sex children to explore identities freely.

Goldis, a lesbian, opposes using medications for non-medical gender non-conformity in children.

Emphasizes risks of misinterpreting sexual orientation as gender identity issue for same-sex youth.

Both Goldis and her friend, who chose not to disclose their last name, underscored the importance of safeguarding the rights of same-sex children to explore their identities without the potential risks associated with certain medications.

They specifically pointed out the dangers of misinterpreting emerging sexual orientation as a gender identity issue, particularly for same-sex attracted youth.

Goldis and her friend's presence at the Supreme Court serves as a reminder of the diverse perspectives surrounding the case and the need to consider the well-being of gender non-conforming individuals, especially minors, in any legal decisions made.