Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Daily Mirror
Daily Mirror
Politics
Pippa Crerar & Dan Bloom & Lizzy Buchan

Sue Gray report will finally be published TODAY as it's handed to Boris Johnson

The Sue Gray report into Downing Street parties will finally be published today - but with key parts left out.

Boris Johnson will give a statement to Parliament at 3.30pm, shortly after the long-awaited inquiry is made public.

But the report will be stripped of key details after the Met Police launched an investigation into around eight of the lockdown gatherings, and asked Ms Gray to make only "minimal reference" to them in her report.

Ms Gray sent her report to Downing Street at 11.20am today. A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: "We can confirm that Sue Gray has provided an update on her investigations to the Prime Minister."

The Prime Minister is expected to apologise to the Commons again and tell them that he accepts her redacted findings in full.

(PA)

Sources said he was planning to tell MPs that the Government will "learn the lessons" of the row before announcing changes to his top team. The PM could announce a new chief operating officer at No10 to review HR policies and set up a new code of conduct for staff, according to one ally.

Mr Johnson is also set to speak to Tory MPs and members of his Cabinet today to shore up support.

Whitehall enforcer Ms Gray took over running the inquiry at the end of last year after Cabinet Secretary Simon Case was sacked when allegations emerged of a party in his department.

Civil servant Sue Gray has been working on the report (Parliament TV)

Downing Street revealed Boris Johnson and Sue Gray “spoke briefly yesterday” - long before the report was officially handed over this morning.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “They briefly discussed the findings. I don’t know exactly what they discussed. As you know, the report comes to the Prime Minister ahead of publication.”

He added: “I don’t think she went into detail of the report, it was more on [logistics].”

Police are also investigating "a number of events" in Downing Street and Whitehall during the pandemic after Ms Gray handed over evidence to Scotland Yard.

The force previously resisted calls to probe allegations of Covid rule-breaking bashes, which were first reported by the Mirror in November.

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick delivered the bombshell U-turn last Tuesday, making Mr Johnson the first PM to face the threat of being interviewed under police caution.

Downing Street said Boris Johnson was willing to cooperate with the police if necessary and Ms Gray handed a dossier of evidence to Scotland Yard on Friday.

Asked if the PM would submit himself to questioning, the PM's official spokesman said: "Anyone who is required to would be expected to cooperate in any way they are asked to."

But police later said any punishments they dish out are likely to be limited to fixed penalty notices, which are not a criminal conviction.

On a visit to the port in Tilbury, Essex, this morning, the Prime Minister refused to say if the imminent report would be a “whitewash".

He added: “Of course I stick absolutely to what I’ve said in the past”.

Downing Street did not rule out Sue Gray publishing a second report at a later date once Scotland Yard finish their investigation.

“We will need to consider what might be appropriate and we’ll be discussing with the independent Cabinet Office team in due course," the PM's spokesman said.

He added it was "unclear" how the ongoing Met Police investigation might "interact with further work on that.” He insisted No10 will publish the report “as received” from Ms Gray.

The police announcement prompted a Whitehall row, with Ms Gray's report delayed by several days while officials tried to work out if it would prejudice a police probe.

The report could reignite Tory pressure on Boris Johnson to resign. 54 MPs need to submit no confidence letters to trigger a formal challenge, and many were holding theirs back until they read the Gray report.

More than 16 parties have been uncovered across Downing Street, Whitehall and Tory HQ during lockdown rules since the Mirror’s first revelations on December 1.

We first uncovered a Downing Street Christmas party on December 18, 2020, while indoor social gatherings in London were banned.

Later revelations included a party with a spread of food in the basement of Tory HQ, which was not included in Ms Gray’s report.

It also emerged staff in No10 brought a suitcase of wine in to leaving dos the night before Prince Philip’s funeral - prompting an apology to the Palace.

Boris Johnson has been waiting for the delayed Sue Gray report (Getty Images)

Downing Street staff held 'wine-time Fridays' throughout the pandemic with Boris Johnson regularly witnessing the gatherings, the Mirror revealed.

Mr Johnson was accused of misleading Parliament after claiming he had been “repeatedly assured” there was no party, only to admit his own attendance at one.

The PM confessed spending 25 minutes at an outdoor “bring your own booze” gathering on May 20, 2020, but claimed he thought it was a work event.

Ex-aide Dominic Cummings, who gave evidence to Sue Gray, said the PM was warned by two separate members of staff that the party broke rules.

What is the Sue Gray report?

Top civil servant Sue Gray investigated a string of parties between May 2020 and April 2021 - mostly in No10 and its garden.

The 64-year-old took over the inquiry from Cabinet Secretary Simon Case after it emerged a party had been held in his own office.

Her probe was set up to get “a general understanding of the nature of the gatherings”. That means saying who attended, the “setting and the purpose”, and “reference to adherence to the guidance in place at the time”.

But she cannot rule whether the PM broke the law (which is for police) or the Ministerial Code (which is for a different watchdog).

And the names of junior staff are likely to be kept anonymous. Disciplinary action will be kept secret too.

Why is it delayed?

Her report was due last week, with Boris Johnson promising to publish it within a short time of receiving it.

But it was thrown into chaos after the Met Police began investigating “a number of” the Downing Street gatherings she’d looked at.

Government and police officials were left wrangling over what parts of the report could prejudice a police investigation.

Sources claimed that Scotland Yard had no objection to the report being published. But after days of confusion, the Met Police clarified: "For the events the Met is investigating, we asked for minimal reference to be made in the Cabinet Office report."

This meant the report had to be either published with key details missing, or delayed entirely. On Friday evening, it emerged Ms Gray had decided to send a stripped-back report to No10 "shortly".

Boris Johnson and Met Police Commissioner Cressida Dick (stock photo) (WPA Pool)

Do the police have a good reason for cutting down the report?

Scotland Yard’s decision prompted bafflement after the force spent weeks not investigating, only to launch one at the worst moment.

Lawyers pointed out Sue Gray’s report was very unlikely to prejudice any court case, because lockdown breaches are almost always punished with on-the-spot fines.

Nazir Afzal, a former chief Crown prosecutor for the North West, said on Twitter : "This is absolute nonsense from the Met Police. A purely factual report by Sue Gray cannot possibly prejudice a police investigation. They just have to follow the evidence, of which the report will be a part."

Top barrister Adam Wagner, who is an expert on Covid rules, tweeted: "I am not a criminal lawyer so perhaps I am missing something. How would a factual civil service report about events the police is investigating 'prejudice' their investigation?"

But others pointed out that Scotland Yard wanted to “avoid any prejudice to our investigation ” - “investigation”, not prosecution.

Nick Aldworth, a former Met chief superintendent, said knowing what’s in the report could “give the potential defendants an opportunity to conceal or alter evidence".

Will the Sue Gray report be published in full?

No10 has repeatedly promised to publish the full findings of Sue Gray - the same report she hands to No10.

But the more relevant question is how much Sue Gray’s report will be “self-censored” before it gets to No10.

Even before the Met statement, the Mirror understood it would not contain all the evidence she received, only a summary, and could leave out individual staff names.

This meant it would not contain elements like text exchanges or photos of Boris Johnson with wine bottles.

After the Met Police have intervened, whole parts of Sue Gray’s account - by definition the most damaging ones - were due to be left out too.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.