Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
National
Amy Sedghi

Tommy Robinson charged with phone offence under Terrorism Act – as it happened

Tommy Robinson arrives at Folkestone police station on Friday
Tommy Robinson arrives at Folkestone police station on Friday Photograph: Chris J Ratcliffe/Reuters

Closing summary

This blog will be closing shortly. Thank you for reading it and for the comments below the line today. You can keep up to date with the Guardian’s UK politics reporting here.

Here is a summary of the latest developments:

  • Keir Starmer does not think all owners of stocks and shares fall outside his definition of “working people”, Downing Street has signalled, amid confusion over who will be protected from tax rises in next week’s budget. The prime minister had suggested asset owners would not fall within his conception of what a working person is. The government has been asked repeatedly to define this term, in a bid to establish which taxes may rise in the budget.

  • On Friday morning, a Treasury minister said it was “important to focus on” where people are getting their money from in relation to the debate over the “working people” definition. James Murray told Sky News that “a working person is someone who goes out to work and who gets their income from work”.

  • Starmer has said he understands the “strength of feeling” in the Commonwealth about reparatory justice but that countries should work together to ensure their future is “not in the shadow of the past, but is illuminated by it”. Speaking in an executive session of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting (Chogm) hosted in Samoa, the prime minister conceded that the Commonwealth had to “acknowledge our shared history – especially when it’s hard”. Downing Street has firmly ruled out paying reparations to its former colonies and said it’s not on the agenda for the summit, but Caribbean countries have been pushing for them to be mentioned in the communique.

  • On the subject of slavery reparations, Downing Street has said that its position on reparations also covers non-financial reparations. The prime minister’s deputy spokesperson said: “Our position on reparations is clear, and that goes for other forms of non-financial reparatory justice too. “The prime minister’s focus is on addressing the challenges that we face.

  • Conservative leadership candidate Robert Jenrick has said the UK should “unequivocally reject” claims of reparations. He said in a speech at the Henry Jackson Society: “We must unequivocally reject these claims, they are based on false and misleading narratives about our past, after all it was Britain that worked harder than nearly any other country to eradicate the slave trade.”

  • Jenrick has said the contest is “absolutely not” over after a survey by ConservativeHome suggested he was trailing Kemi Badenoch by 31% to 55%. Asked whether the contest was all over, Jenrick said: “Absolutely not – this is neck and neck, that’s a survey not a poll.”

  • Downing Street will announce five new freeports in next week’s budget as part of its effort to drive economic growth. Ministers will set out plans to establish five new low-tax zones, plus an investment zone in the East Midlands, where businesses will benefit from tax breaks such as lower tariffs and customs. Starmer said the freeports being announced next week would “have this government’s stamp on them” despite being a policy inherited from the Tories.

  • Rachel Reeves must “get the balance right” when announcing changes to Britain’s debt rules in next week’s budget given the potential knock-on effects to borrowing and mortgage rates, the boss of NatWest has warned. The bank’s chief executive, Paul Thwaite, said markets would be sensitive to the chancellor’s reasons for releasing up to £50bn of borrowing headroom after she confirmed in Washington on Thursday that she planned to rewrite her fiscal rules.

  • The value of the UK’s private healthcare market rose to a record £12.4bn last year as long NHS waiting lists fuelled demand from individuals and the health service paid for nearly £3.5bn of procedures to help ease the care backlog. As private medical insurance boomed, total revenues generated in the independent healthcare sector hit an all-time high in real terms pegged to 2003 prices, research revealed.

  • Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson, has been charged with failing to provide the pin to his mobile phone under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, Kent police said. The charge is in relation to an incident in Folkestone on Sunday 28 July after officers stopped Robinson under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000. Supporters of Robinson are due to hold a demonstration on Saturday, which is expected to be met with a counter-protest from Stand Up to Racism campaigners.

  • Downing Street is blocking moves to include a ban on smoking outdoors in the upcoming Tobacco and Vapes bill amid fierce opposition by the hospitality trade. No 10 officials privately believe that banning people from lighting up in pub gardens is “an unserious” policy and is not backed by good evidence showing that it harms non-smokers.

  • The SNP will need to make “uncomfortable commitments” to gain the support of the Scottish Greens for the budget, Lorna Slater has said. The Greens’ co-leader said her party will require the Scottish government to make promises similar to those made in the Bute House agreement (BHA).

  • AstraZeneca has said it may cut jobs at its UK operation if the government enforces a global push to make companies share profits derived from nature’s genetic codes, multiple sources have told the Guardian. The alleged comments from the company came amid a concerted lobbying push by the pharmaceutical industry against the profit-sharing measures.

  • Two Scottish pensioners have been given permission to proceed with their legal challenge against the UK and Scottish and governments’ decision to cut the winter fuel payment. The case’s argument rests on the accusation that both governments failed to adequately consult those of pension age on the change and did not release an equality impact assessment on the changes.

  • Michelle O’Neill has insisted the powersharing structures in Northern Ireland remain stable after several controversies that have hit Sinn Féin. In an effort to draw a line under a difficult month for her party, the first minister said she has spent four weeks answering questions on the various furores but was now keen to focus on the future for the devolved executive she jointly leads with DUP deputy first minister Emma Little-Pengelly.

  • The EU executive has said it has failed to reach agreement with the UK government in a dispute over fishing rights and has triggered an arbitration process under the post-Brexit deal. The European Commission announced on Friday that it was requesting an arbitration tribunal over the UK’s decision to ban industrial fishing of sandeel in the North Sea.

  • More than 29,000 migrants have arrived in the UK so far this year after crossing the Channel, including 500 in a single day, Home Office figures show. On Thursday, 509 people made the journey in 11 boats, taking the provisional total for 2024 to date to 29,154.

  • A former UK defence chief has warned “dire consequences” would follow if European leaders fail to hold their nerve and continue to support Ukraine. Jock Stirrup, who served as head of the armed forces between 2006 and 2010, acknowledged there are “signs of growing war weariness” and a desire to end the conflict whatever it takes. Speaking during a House of Lords debate, Lord Stirrup said it has been a “difficult” year for Ukraine as weapons and personnel shortages are “hampering” its efforts to deal with the “grinding war of attrition” pursued by Russia. When opening the debate, defence minister Vernon Coaker, reiterated the UK government’s support for Ukraine as he said Russia’s war represented a “sustained attack” on the United Nations charter and the rules and norms that underpin security and prosperity.

  • Businesses that import critical minerals to the UK will be given access to state-backed loans in a move to counter China’s dominance in the market. The chancellor is expected to announce extra government support to encourage the import of critical minerals such as lithium, graphite and cobalt in her budget next week.

Updated

Tommy Robinson charged under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, say Kent police

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, better known as Tommy Robinson, has been charged with failing to provide the pin to his mobile phone under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act, Kent police said.

The charge is in relation to an incident in Folkestone on Sunday 28 July after officers stopped Robinson under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

The PA news agency reports that Robinson has been bailed to appear at Westminster magistrates court on 13 November 2024.

Supporters of Robinson are due to hold a demonstration on Saturday, which is expected to be met with a counter-protest from Stand Up to Racism campaigners.

The Metropolitan police and British Transport Police are due to be supported by officers from other forces across the country as the Met said there will be a “significant police presence” to ensure the two groups are kept apart.

Robinson arrived at Folkestone police station shortly after 3pm on Friday.

• This post was amended on 25 October as it initially said the counter-protest would be from Stop the War campaigners.

Updated

Two Scottish pensioners have been given permission to proceed with their legal challenge against the UK and Scottish and governments’ decision to cut the winter fuel payment, reports the PA news agency.

The decision by the court of session means the challenge, brought by Peter and Florence Fanning, of Coatbridge, North Lanarkshire, will now proceed to a procedural hearing in December ahead of a full “substantive” hearing in January.

The proceedings were raised with the help of the Govan Law Centre against the Scottish government and the UK work and pensions secretary after the move to end universal entitlement to the payment.

The decision, which was announced by chancellor, Rachel Reeves, following Labour’s election win, led to the Scottish government – which was due to take control over a similar payment through the devolved Social Security Scotland but has since announced a delay – to follow suit.

According to the PA news agency, the case asks the court to rule whether the decision was unlawful, which would then allow the petitioners to ask the court to, in effect, set aside the policy and restore the winter fuel payment to all.

Govan Law Centre said the permission to proceed, which was granted by Lady Hood in Edinburgh on Thursday, means the case has been assessed as having “a real prospect of success” in terms the applicable legislation.

A spokesperson for Govan Law Centre said:

Our clients are delighted that the court has granted permission for their judicial review challenge to proceed to a full hearing in early January.

We await a decision on civil legal aid from the Scottish Legal Aid Board early next week in relation to the proceedings.

If civil legal aid is granted we will then submit an urgent application for sanction for the employment of both junior and senior counsel and will announce our final legal team in early course.”

The case’s argument rests on the accusation that both governments failed to adequately consult those of pension age on the change and did not release an equality impact assessment on the changes.

The PA news agency reports that a freedom of information request revealed an abridged version of such an assessment had been carried out by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), with the UK government arguing a full study was not required.

The Fannings’ legal action was launched in September with the support of former first minster and Alba party leader Alex Salmond, who died on 12 October.

The UK and Scottish governments were asked for comment by the PA news agency.

Updated

The SNP will need to make “uncomfortable commitments” to gain the support of the Scottish Greens for the budget, Lorna Slater has said.

According to the PA news agency, the Greens’ co-leader said her party will require the Scottish government to make promises similar to those made in the Bute House agreement (BHA).

The BHA was struck between the two parties after the 2021 Holyrood election by then first minister Nicola Sturgeon, Slater and her fellow Green co-leader Patrick Harvie. The deal saw Slater and Harvie join the government as ministers as agreement was reached across a raft of progressive policies. Those included commitments on rent controls and reforming the Gender Recognition Act to make it easier for trans people to change their legally recognised sex.

Speaking to the PA news agency on Friday ahead of the Scottish Greens’ conference in Greenock at the weekend, Slater said her party is willing to work with the government on its budget.

“We’re willing to go into negotiations on the budget with an open mind,” she said, adding:

But we need to be clear about what we need to see in that budget, and it’s going to be the same kind of commitments that we saw under the Bute House agreement.”

Slater said she wants to see a “clear focus” on the climate emergency and poverty. “That means the SNP need to commit to doing some things which may be uncomfortable for them,” she said. “Things like putting in place some taxes to support local authorities, things like the cruise ship levy.”

The BHA ended earlier this year and then first minister Humza Yousaf sacked Slater and Harvie from his government in a move which ultimately led to his own resignation.

The SNP failed to return a majority of MSPs in 2021 and relied on the Greens to form a majority. Since the BHA collapsed, the SNP has governed as a minority and it means each vote requires support from one of the opposition parties.

Also speaking on Friday, Harvie said the government must use “every lever possible” to protect public services in the upcoming budget, “including improvements to the tax system”.

The Greens have proposed a number of taxes targeting the wealthy, including on private jets and mansions. Income tax is already higher in Scotland than elsewhere in the UK, with changes made by the Scottish government meaning anyone who earns over £28,000 will begin to pay more tax than those south of the border.

Harvie told the PA news agency:

We’ve made good progress on having a fairer tax system in terms of income so that the wealthiest, the highest earners, are paying their fair share, and people on low and middle incomes are protected.

But we need to broaden that approach and make sure that we’re doing everything possible to protect public services.”

Finance secretary Shona Robison will unveil her budget on 4 December. She has warned finances are tight, having already announced up to £500m worth of cuts to public services in the summer.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver the UK budget on 30 October.

The Scottish government has been approached for comment by the PA news agency.

While the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, grapples with the parlous £40bn funding gap in Britain’s finances, another £25bn of annual revenue is revving up to disappear into the sunset.

As the Treasury knows all too well, turning cars electric will spell the end of that great money-spinner fuel duty. But no one appears ready to grab the wheel and tax motoring in a different way.

Road pricing was the future, once, and Tony Blair, its last champion in Downing Street, is back via his TBI thinktank to push it again. Proponents of road pricing – or metering, charging, pay-per-mile – have traditionally been driven by two impulses: managing road congestion, and raising revenue fairly from motoring. The former most concerned the last Labour government; the latter has become a clear and present danger for the Treasury.

That £25bn from fuel duty, levied on petrol and diesel at the pumps, more or less covers the entire cost of Britain’s road and railway system. Electric cars, which pay zero fuel duty, make up almost a fifth of new registrations.

The TBI is the latest group to weigh in ahead of Reeves’ 30 October budget, urging her to introduce a road charge of 1p per mile for cars and vans, and 2.5p to 4p for lorries and HGVs – “a crucial step in reforming motoring taxation for the electric-vehicle era [and] preventing a growth-stifling rise in congestion”.

It follows the Campaign for Better Transport, which suggests pay-per-mile charges initially for electric vehicles only. A host of other groups, including the RAC, have also declared the need for similar reform. The head of the National Infrastructure Commission, Sir John Armitt, said road pricing was “inevitable”.

But is it? Motorists have got used to being treated with kid gloves come budget time. Since 2010, Conservative chancellors have made great play of freezing fuel duty instead of supposedly scheduled rises – with Rishi Sunak’s temporary 5p cut in 2022 leaving it at 52.9p – to much acclaim from the rightwing press, for whom fuel duty and protecting the interests of the “white-van man” has become a totemic issue.

Inflationary rises – the kind applied to rail fares – would have pushed duty past £1 per litre, netting the exchequer at least £20bn a year more today.

It is a phrase that crops up 21 times in the Labour manifesto, 12 times in the Conservative manifesto, and has been used in the House of Commons more than 3,500 times in the last decade. So, surely everyone knows what “working people” are – don’t we?

Perhaps not. In the buildup to next week’s budget there has been ever-increasing scrutiny and a parallel lack of clarity about what Labour’s manifesto commitment to not raise taxes on “working people” actually means in practice.

While ministers may want to insist that nothing can be given away in advance of a budget, they have faced inevitable questions about what they would view as a working person, often with mixed results.

Speaking to broadcasters in Samoa, Keir Starmer said he would not use the term for people who had income from assets such as shares or property. “They wouldn’t come within my definition,” he said. Downing Street hastily clarified that the prime minister did not mean people who owned small amounts of, for example, stocks or shares.

There was, inevitably, a long round of questions at the subsequent No 10 media briefing about precisely who did fit the definition. Starmer’s spokesperson set this out as “those who have to rely on their pay packets and do not always have the means to write a cheque, and it is those who are hardest hit by economic instability”.

What the PM had been referring to, she added, was “the broadest sense of who was in his mind’s eye when it comes to the importance of economic stability” – in other words, to an extent a working person is whoever Starmer sees them as being.

Amid this slightly salad-like cascade of words sit two interlocking definitions, the first economic and relatively precise, the other political and notably more woolly.

Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell has written an opinion piece for the Guardian. In it he says that as she delivers her budget, Rachel Reeves must not forget Labour’s historic mission. Here is a snippet:

With the constant drip of stories about possible tax hikes or reinterpretations of the fiscal rules, it’s easy to forget the underlying purpose of any budget. There are two fundamental but straightforward questions to guide a chancellor’s thinking. The first is what society do you want to create? The second is what are the economic measures that will aid its creation?

Labour’s historic mission has been to ensure a good standard of living through decent wages, access to health services and education not dependent on what you could pay, and housing you could afford. But above all else Labour pledged to build a society where poverty would no longer exist by creating a safety net to ensure the most vulnerable, children and unemployed, sick, elderly or disabled people, were no longer at risk.

To achieve all this, the postwar Labour government introduced the most progressive, civilising innovation in our country’s history, the welfare state, funded by a redistributive system of taxation. Any budget under a Labour government since then should be measured on its contribution to achieving this mission.

You can read the full piece here:

Updated

Thank you all for your contributions and discussion so far. Comments below the line will close at 3pm today.

Michelle O’Neill has insisted the powersharing structures in Northern Ireland remain stable after several controversies that have hit Sinn Féin, reports the PA news agency.

In an effort to draw a line under a difficult month for her party, the first minister said she has spent four weeks answering questions on the various furores but was now keen to focus on the future for the devolved executive she jointly leads with DUP deputy first minister Emma Little-Pengelly.

“I spent four weeks now answering questions, where I’m focused on now is the business of government,” O’Neill told the BBC. She added:

“Emma and I have a lot of work to get through. We’re determined to continue to lead from the front on all the key issues. That’s the job at hand. That’s the job that I’m committed to as first minister.”

The PA news agency reports that on a visit to the opening of a new Irish language school in Strabane, Co Tyrone, O’Neill insisted that the institutions at Stormont were “stable”.
“Government is stable, the executive is stable,” she said, adding:

We are there to work together. I believe there’s a collective will across the executive to make politics work here. I believe that’s what the public demand and deserve. I’m determined to lead that executive.”

Her comments come a day after the executive office posted a social media video that saw O’Neill and Little-Pengelly speak positively about the potential for the coalition administration.

Sinn Féin has been criticised in recent weeks for its handling of a number of controversies, including that of former press officer Michael McMonagle and ex-senator Niall O Donnghaile.

Keir Starmer’s refusal to discuss enslavement reparations has only magnified the issue, writes the Guardian’s community affairs correspondent, Aamna Mohdin.

In her analysis piece, Mohdin writes:

The government’s current position puts it out of step with a number of UK institutions, such as the Church of England, the University of Glasgow and Lloyds Bank – as well as the Guardian – who, in recent years, have not only issued formal apologies but announced proposals for reparatory justice.

The insistence on focusing on “current future-facing challenges” such as climate resilience and debt restructuring went down like a lead balloon with legal experts, campaigners and the Caribbean Community (Caricom). Many felt it showed a deep ignorance of what the campaign for reparative justice actually is.

Others bristled at the top-down approach to announce what will and will not be discussed at the meeting – and what they describe as an attempt to shut down meaningful discussions.

The furore displays a gap in race and equality policymaking in No 10, which confirmed in its daily press briefing that Starmer does not have a specific race adviser.

You can read the full piece here:

Updated

Conservative former Foreign Office minister Tariq Ahmad acknowledged the “wise words and wisdom” from Jock Stirrup on Ukraine (see 1.34pm BST).

According to the PA news agency, during a House of Lords debate Ahmad said:

A bit of learning here for ministers: listening to the noble and gallant Lord [Stirrup] was something I found extremely beneficial.”

Labour former minister John Spellar, making his maiden speech, said:

I also warn, as Lord Stirrup did, against the complacent view that a deal with Putin that allows him to claim victory will end the war. It may end the battle, it will not end the war and we need absolutely to understand that.”

The PA news agency reports that when opening the debate, defence minister Vernon Coaker, reiterated the UK government’s support for Ukraine as he said Russia’s war represented a “sustained attack” on the United Nations charter and the rules and norms that underpin security and prosperity.

He said:

That is why Russia must lose and be seen to lose because global security is indivisible. What happens in Ukraine has an impact around the world.”

Lord Coaker also told peers:

Regardless of who wins the US election, it is pretty clear a new US president will be looking towards European Nato allies to step up and take greater responsibility for European security.”

'Dire consequences' would follow if European leaders lose nerve over Ukraine, says former UK defence chief

A former UK defence chief has warned “dire consequences” would follow if European leaders fail to hold their nerve and continue to support Ukraine, reports the PA news agency.

Jock Stirrup, who served as head of the armed forces between 2006 and 2010, acknowledged there are “signs of growing war weariness” and a desire to end the conflict whatever it takes.

But he said this would be a “disastrous mistake” and make the prospect of a wider war more likely, as he predicted Russian president Vladimir Putin would ultimately ignore any settlement with Ukraine.

Western officials earlier this month said they could not “see any prospect for a negotiation anytime soon” over the war, which has been ongoing since 2014 with Russia launching a full-scale invasion in February 2022.

Speaking during a House of Lords debate, Lord Stirrup said it has been a “difficult” year for Ukraine as weapons and personnel shortages are “hampering” its efforts to deal with the “grinding war of attrition” pursued by Russia.

According to the PA news agency, he told peers:

But we should not assume that all the pressures are on the Ukrainian side. The appearance of North Korean soldiers in the conflict and the widening of the pool of prisoners, which Russia seeks to recruit soldiers from for the frontline underscores the difficulties that Putin is facing.

The FCDO (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office) assesses that these difficulties will reach crisis proportions by the end of 2025/beginning of 2026. The question then is how Ukraine is to stay in the fight until then.

But for Ukraine to stay in the fight, Europe and ideally the United States must stay in the fight. In both regions, however, there are signs of growing war weariness and a desire to end the conflict whatever it takes. This would be a disastrous mistake.”

On the “logical consequences” of such a near-term settlement, Stirrup said he presumed an international agreement would be drawn up and signed by both sides.
But the independent crossbench peer warned:

We’ve been there before and we’ve seen only too clearly how little Putin regards or respects such agreements.

The moment he feels they constrain his ambitions, he casts them aside without a second thought. Any piece of paper to which he puts his name would have about as much value as the one Neville Chamberlain waved in front of the cameras at Heston Aerodrome in 1938.”

Stirrup said neither side would be satisfied with an outcome that left the other in control of part of Ukraine, explaining:

Putin would simply pursue his assault on his neighbour by undercover means while the Ukrainians would do the same in an effort to regain their lost territories until open fighting eventually broke out again.”

According to the PA news agency, he went on to express concerns over potential nuclear proliferation and Russia using food as a “political tool” to spread its “malign influence more widely” in Africa.

Stirrup concluded:

I don’t aim to convince the minister or the government, I do not doubt their resolve.

But European leaders need to do a much better job at explaining to their citizens the dire consequences that would attend a failure of nerve over Ukraine.

Negotiating from a position of relative weakness would not bring an end to the conflict, it would carry huge nuclear risks, it would create fissures within western Europe, it will weaken deterrence and it’d make a wider war more rather than less likely.

It will leave our children and grandchildren a fearful legacy for which they would surely and rightly condemn us.”

Updated

EU triggers dispute panel in fishing row with UK

The EU executive has said it has failed to reach agreement with the UK government in a dispute over fishing rights and has triggered an arbitration process under the post-Brexit deal.

The European Commission announced on Friday that it was requesting an arbitration tribunal over the UK’s decision to ban industrial fishing of sandeel in the North Sea.

Rishi Sunak’s government closed the sandeel fishery in March 2024 to protect puffin and kittiwake birds that depend on the small fish for food, as well as restricting harmful bottom trawling that damages fragile sealife on the seafloor. But the EU argues that decision breaches the post-Brexit Trade and Cooperation agreement that gives European fishing boats catch rights in UK waters.

After several months of inconclusive talks to resolve the dispute, the commission said it was moving to the next step in the dispute resolution process.

A commission spokesperson said on Friday:

Since no such mutually agreeable solution was found during the consultations, we are now simply proceeding with the next steps in line with the trade and cooperation agreement to find a solution.”

The EU remained “open to finding a mutually agreeable solution”, the spokesperson added.

Under the TCA, either the EU or UK can request an arbitration panel, which will consist of three members: nominees from both sides and a mutually agreed chair.

The panel should be established within 10 days of any request and is expected to give a binding ruling in around four to five months.

When the previous government confirmed the closure of sandeel fishing at the start of this year, it quoted the head of the RSPB describing the decision as “a vital lifeline from our government for our seabirds when they need it most”.

The commission claims that measures are already in place to protect sandeel in line with scientific advice.

Downing Street to announce new freeports in Budget in revival of Tory policy

Downing Street will announce five new freeports in next week’s budget as part of its effort to drive economic growth.

Ministers will set out plans to establish five new low-tax zones, plus an investment zone in the East Midlands, where businesses will benefit from tax breaks such as lower tariffs and customs.

Freeports operated without great impact in the UK between 1984 and 2012, when they were phased out by David Cameron. Rishi Sunak re-established them while he was chancellor to try to offset post-Brexit tariffs and create the conditions for long-term stable investment. Since 2021, eight have been opened in England and two each in Scotland and Wales.

Keir Starmer said the freeports being announced next week would “have this government’s stamp on them” despite being a policy inherited from the Tories.

Read the full story here:

More than 29,000 migrants have arrived in the UK so far this year after crossing the Channel, including 500 in a single day, Home Office figures show.

On Thursday, 509 people made the journey in 11 boats, taking the provisional total for 2024 to date to 29,154.

This is 10% higher than the 26,501 recorded this time last year but 24% lower than the 38,129 people making the journey at this stage in 2022.

No 10 rules out non-financial reparations

On the subject of slavery reparations, Downing Street has said that its position on reparations also covers non-financial reparations.

The prime minister’s deputy spokesperson said:

Our position on reparations is clear, and that goes for other forms of non-financial reparatory justice too.

The prime minister’s focus is on addressing the challenges that we face.

They added the prime minister has “been clear that the issues that have come up the most” at the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting are “climate change and also the opportunities presented in terms of trade and growth between this grouping of like-minded nations”.

Updated

We have a bit more from No 10 on the confusion over the Labour manifesto’s definition of “working people” who would be protected from tax rises.

Asked whether people with stocks and shares are classed as “working people”, the prime minister’s deputy spokesperson said:

The point that the prime minister was making in his interviews yesterday is that it is those who cannot always write a cheque who are the hardest hit by economic shocks - and that’s why it’s vital that we restore economic stability and that’s what you’ll see set out in terms of the approach at the budget next week.

The spokesperson later added:

He was speaking about who is at the forefront of his mind’s eye in terms of the priorities and the decisions that the government takes when it comes to economic stability.

Rachel Reeves must “get the balance right” when announcing changes to Britain’s debt rules in next week’s budget given the potential knock-on effects to borrowing and mortgage rates, the boss of NatWest has warned.

The bank’s chief executive, Paul Thwaite, said markets would be sensitive to the chancellor’s reasons for releasing up to £50bn of borrowing headroom after she confirmed in Washington on Thursday that she planned to rewrite her fiscal rules.

Thwaite said it was not a surprise that the new Labour government was looking to change the way public debt was measured in order to boost its spending power, noting that the UK had “many different fiscal frameworks in recent years”.

However, he added that the way in which financial markets react to those changes, and the subsequent knock-on effects to borrowing and mortgage rates, will depend on what the government plans to spend that money on.

“The market will take into account, really, what’s trying to be achieved by any change,” Thwaite said after the bank reported its third-quarter results on Friday. “So [they will focus on] what does that mean for spending, what does it mean for investments, what does it mean for tax, rather than the specific rules per se.”

The warning comes two years after the disastrous mini-budget of the then prime minister, Liz Truss, in which announcements over unfunded tax cuts for the wealthy triggered a market meltdown and a surge in borrowing costs that hit homeowners across the country.

Updated

Businesses that import critical minerals to the UK will be given access to state-backed loans in a move to counter China’s dominance in the market.

The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is expected to announce extra government support to encourage the import of critical minerals such as lithium, graphite and cobalt in her budget next week. Companies that bring supplies of critical minerals into the UK will be able to access state-backed loans under the UK export finance mechanism.

Critical minerals are key raw materials for technologies used in the supply of renewable energy and production of electric car batteries. They are also used in the defence and aerospace industries.

The move is intended to make it easier for UK businesses to import critical minerals from Commonwealth countries such as Australia, which has huge deposits of lithium and other raw materials.

Demand for critical minerals is expected to far exceed supply over the next decade. Countries are increasingly reliant on imports from China, which has bought up critical mineral reserves around the world. China controlled 72% of the world’s supply of lithium and 68% of cobalt in 2022, according to figures from the Chatham House thinktank.

The announcement was to be made on the margins of the Commonwealth summit in Samoa. Asked whether western countries should be countering China’s influence in Commonwealth countries in the Indo-Pacific, a UK government spokesperson said it was “an incredibly important strategic area”.

They said:

The Pacific is a crucial area for geopolitics, security and economic interests. By 2050 over half of global growth will come from the wider Indo-Pacific and 60% of global shipping trade already transits in this region.”

No 10 blocking outdoor smoking ban amid hospitality opposition

Downing Street is blocking moves to include a ban on smoking outdoors in the upcoming Tobacco and Vapes bill amid fierce opposition by the hospitality trade.

No 10 officials privately believe that banning people from lighting up in pub gardens is “an unserious” policy and is not backed by good evidence showing that it harms non-smokers.

Differences of opinion in government about an outdoor ban, and uncertainty about the potential risks of pressing ahead with it, lie behind the delayed publication of its long-promised landmark bill. It will make the UK the world’s first country to progressively raise the age at which people can buy tobacco until no one can do so legally.

Keir Starmer has insisted that he is ready to face down critics of his drive to eradicate smoking because action is needed to reduce the 80,000 annual death toll from Britain’s biggest killer.

But No 10 was said to be “spooked” by strongly worded warnings that job losses and pub closures will result if smoking in some outdoor settings is outlawed, despite the prime minister’s repeated insistence that “nanny state” jibes will not stop him taking robust action to improve public health.

The Guardian understands that Morgan McSweeney, the prime minister’s chief of staff, is not keen on proceeding with it, despite Starmer’s previous refusal to rule it out.

“It is an unserious policy. Nobody really believes smoking outdoors is a major health problem,” one Downing Street official said.

The trade body UKHospitality said the ban threatens “serious economic harm to hospitality venues” and would hit nightclubs, hotels, cafes and restaurants as well as pubs.

The British Beer and Pub Association said the plan was “deeply concerning and difficult to understand” and “yet another blow to the viability of our nation’s vital community assets”.

Ending smokers’ ability to go outside a pub to have a cigarette, for example in a beer garden, “would have a devastating impact on pubs already struggling” with rising costs, it claimed.

You can read the full piece by Pippa Crerar and Denis Campbell here:

AstraZeneca has said it may cut jobs at its UK operation if the government enforces a global push to make companies share profits derived from nature’s genetic codes, multiple sources have told the Guardian.

The alleged comments from the company came amid a concerted lobbying push by the pharmaceutical industry against the profit-sharing measures.

Sources told the Guardian that the British-Swedish biotech company – which made $5.96bn (£4.59bn) profit last year – made the comments during a Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs roundtable meeting last week to discuss a proposed new global levy on drugs derived from the digital forms of biodiversity. A spokesperson for AstraZeneca denied the comments were made by their representative.

The genetic codes of nature – which, when stored digitally, are known as digital sequence information (DSI) – are playing a growing role in new drug development in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries.

But there is widespread anger among biodiverse countries about how DSI is being used by multinational companies to develop commercial products – almost always for free. Most of the world’s remaining biodiversity is concentrated in poorer countries. They argue that the free use of this genetic information amounts to “biopiracy”, and say companies should share profits when indigenous species are used to develop commercial products.

Global leaders have already agreed in principle that these benefits should be shared more fairly. They are now gathered in Cali, Colombia, at the biodiversity Cop16, in negotiations over what form that sharing should take.

Ideas under consideration include a 1% global tax on profits of goods derived from DSI, which could cost the Cambridge-based company as much as $60m if enforced by the UK government [that figure represents an estimated maximum, as not all of the firm’s profit would be derived from DSI].

Tory leadership hopeful says UK should reject claims of reparations

Conservative leadership candidate Robert Jenrick has said the UK should “unequivocally reject” claims of reparations, reports the PA news agency.

“While the topic of overseas aid and reparations is being discussed, let me confront it head on,” he said in a speech at the Henry Jackson Society.

He added:

We must unequivocally reject these claims, they are based on false and misleading narratives about our past, after all it was Britain that worked harder than nearly any other country to eradicate the slave trade.”

Updated

Conservative leadership candidate Robert Jenrick has said the contest is “absolutely not” over after a survey by ConservativeHome suggested he was trailing Kemi Badenoch by 31% to 55%, reports the PA news agency.

Asked whether the contest was all over, Jenrick said:

Absolutely not – this is neck and neck, that’s a survey not a poll.”

He claimed that previous polls had shown the contest to be “neck and neck”, adding:

There’s everything to fight for, and I’m certainly going off around the country as I have throughout the summer.

And I think my message is resonating with members and with the public that we need to learn our lessons, we need to have strong and clear policies now, not the vague promise of one tomorrow, unite the party and take the fight to Labour as quickly as possible.”

Additionally, Jenrick said in a speech at the Henry Jackson Society in London that the UK “must” spend 3% of GDP on defence. He added:

Because we should not be borrowing or taxing more, this money should come from our overseas aid budget”.

“Our generosity will soon look very foolish if our weakness contributes to a war,” he added.

He also said that “3% of GDP should be the new Nato standard expected of all member states”.

Updated

Private healthcare boom fuelled by NHS waiting lists

The value of the UK’s private healthcare market rose to a record £12.4bn last year as long NHS waiting lists fuelled demand from individuals and the health service paid for nearly £3.5bn of procedures to help ease the care backlog.

As private medical insurance boomed, total revenues generated in the independent healthcare sector hit an all-time high in real terms pegged to 2003 prices, research revealed.

The total value of work done in hospitals, clinics and by privately practising doctors, including cataract removals, knee surgery and MRI scans, was £1bn higher than in 2022, according to the latest report by the health data provider LaingBuisson.

More patients went private last year as the NHS waiting list peaked at 7.77 million in September, up sharply from 4.57 million at the end of 2019. Increasing numbers took out private medical insurance to fund their treatment, while there has been a decline in those paying out of their own pockets, LaingBuisson said.

To help clear the backlog, the NHS paid more to private providers to offer treatments. It spent £2.1bn in private hospitals last year – up from £1.9bn in 2022 – accounting for nearly a third of their revenues, compared with 10% two decades ago. The NHS spent a further £1.5bn at private clinics.

Of 1.3m procedures carried out by private hospitals and clinics in 2023, nearly 445,000 were funded by the health service, the report found.

Cataract surgery is the most common private procedure, costing about £2,000 for private payers and less for NHS contracts. Chemotherapy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopies, colonoscopies, hip replacements, knee arthroscopies and replacements and hernia repair were the top private procedures.

Wes Streeting, the health secretary, wants to use the private sector to cut the NHS care backlog. This week, he said delays within the health service spelled a “death sentence” for some NHS patients, as Keir Starmer stressed the need for more use of AI and technology.

Updated

Group that emerged from Tory party hosts forum for Britain’s far right

A group that emerged out of a faction of the Conservative party has become a forum for Britain’s splintered far right.

A private conference hosted earlier this month by the Traditional Britain Group (TBG) was attended by figures from the Homeland party, an extreme nationalist group, as well as rivals from other groups such as Patriotic Alternative.

Speakers at the conference, held behind closed doors in a luxury London hotel, included Gerold Otten, a member of Germany’s Bundestag for the rising Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, and Lynda Rose, an Anglican priest and the CEO of a Christian pressure group working with senior conservative figures in the Church of England.

Another keynote speaker was David Clews, a former Tory councillor who runs a conspiracy theory website, which was a prolific spreader of misinformation against the backdrop of this summer’s riots.

The TBG, which was founded by a former officer of the Monday Club after the Conservative party severed links with the group, gained prominence after the then Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg addressed its annual dinner. He then “dissociated” himself from it and later described his attendance as a “mistake”.

Among those attending the TBG’s annual conference on Saturday at St Ermin’s hotel in Westminster, which is owned by the Marriott Group, were at least three activists from the Homeland party, which is regarded as one of the most dangerous groups on the British far right.

They included Kenny Smith, a former BNP activist who was previously admonished after pleading guilty to firearms charges, and Anthony Burrows, a parish councillor who lost a shotgun licence and had three shotguns seized by police because of concerns over his far-right links.

Rose, the CEO of the socially conservative Voice for Justice UK Christian campaign group, told the Guardian she was not, and is not, aware of any links of delegates to the conference with far-right or extremist groups.

She said:

I have no knowledge of the affiliations of members within the Traditional Britain group.”

She said she had attended to inform delegates of the work of the Commission of Inquiry into Discrimination Against Christians (CIDAC).

Reeves signals she will rewrite the way government debt is measured in first budget

The continuing row over ministers’ definition of working people came as the chancellor signalled she would rewrite the way government debt is measured in her first budget.

During a round of broadcast interviews while attending the International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington DC, Rachel Reeves said she faced difficult choices but insisted her budget would “begin to fix the NHS and start to rebuild our economy”, reports the PA news agency.

The cost of government borrowing increased in response to speculation the chancellor would change debt rules to spend billions more on investments.

Tory former chancellor Jeremy Hunt said increased borrowing could increase the cost of mortgages for hundreds of thousands of households.

Reeves confirmed a technical change in the way she would measure progress against the target of managing debt. Writing in the Financial Times, Reeves said her fiscal rules would be “the rock of stability at the core of my budget”.

Labour’s 2024 election manifesto said Reeves would follow two rules: the current budget would be in balance so that day-to-day costs are met by revenues; the second rule is that debt must be falling as a share of the economy by the fifth year of the economic forecast.

On Thursday she confirmed that the way debt is measured as part of that target would be changed to allow greater flexibility.

According to the PA news agency, Reeves said:

My fiscal rules will do two things. The first and most important: my stability rule will mean that day-to-day spending will be matched by revenues. Given the state of the public finances and the need to invest in our public services, this rule will bite hardest.

Alongside tough decisions on spending and welfare, that means taxes will need to rise to ensure this rule is met. I will always protect working people when I make these choices, while taking a balanced approach.

Crucially, my stability rule will also cover the interest on our national debt and unlike the previous government I won’t cut capital budgets to make up for shortfalls in the day-to-day running costs of departments.

My second fiscal rule, the investment rule, will get debt falling as a proportion of our economy. That will make space for increased investment in the fabric of our economy, and ensure we don’t see the falls in public sector investment that were planned under the last government.”

Reeves is expected to target public sector net financial liabilities (PSNFL) as her new benchmark for government debt rather than the current measure of underlying public sector net debt, reports the PA news agency.

Updated

Starmer attempts to clarify 'working people' tax pledge ahead of budget

Keir Starmer does not think all owners of stocks and shares fall outside his definition of “working people”, Downing Street has signalled, amid confusion over who will be protected from tax rises in next week’s budget.

The prime minister had suggested asset owners would not fall within his conception of what a working person is. The government has been asked repeatedly to define this term, in a bid to establish which taxes may rise in the budget.

Labour’s manifesto said the party would not increase taxes on working people, including VAT, national insurance, and income tax.

During a broadcast interview at a Commonwealth summit in Samoa, Starmer told Sky News that he does not consider people who have an income from assets such as shares of property to be working people. “They wouldn’t come within my definition,” he said.

The hint at who falls outside the scope of Starmer’s definition could point to where tax rises might come from in the budget. Among the levies which are reportedly under consideration for a hike are capital gains tax, inheritance tax, and fuel duty, reports the PA news agency.

In a partial climbdown on Starmer’s position, Downing Street later clarified that people who hold a small amount of savings in stocks and shares still count as working people.

The prime minister’s official spokesperson said Starmer meant someone who primarily gets their income from assets in his interview.

On Friday morning, a Treasury minister said it was “important to focus on” where people are getting their money from in relation to the debate over the “working people” definition.

James Murray told Sky News that “a working person is someone who goes out to work and who gets their income from work”.

Pushed further on whether a working person could also get income from shares or property, Murray added:

We’re talking about where people get their money from, and so working people get their money from going out to work. And it’s that money that we’re talking about in terms of those commitments we made around income tax, around national insurance.

That’s what’s important to focus on, where people are getting their money from, getting their money from going out to work.”

Updated

Starmer says he understands 'strength of feeling' about reparatory justice but future should not be ‘in shadow of past’

Eleni Courea reporting from Apia:

Keir Starmer has said he understands the “strength of feeling” in the Commonwealth about reparatory justice but that countries should work together to ensure their future is “not in the shadow of the past, but is illuminated by it”.

Speaking in an executive session of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting (Chogm) hosted in Samoa, the prime minister conceded that the Commonwealth had to “acknowledge our shared history – especially when it’s hard”.

Downing Street has firmly ruled out paying reparations to its former colonies and said it’s not on the agenda for the summit, but Caribbean countries have been pushing for them to be mentioned in the communique.

“I understand the strength of feeling here and that there are some calls to face up to the harms and injustices of the past through reparatory justice,” Starmer told leaders.

“The UK believes the most effective way to maintain a spirit of respect and dignity is by working together to make sure the future is not in the shadow of the past, but is illuminated by it.”

The Guardian reported this week that the UK was open to discussing non-cash forms of reparatory justice such as reforming financial institutions

Starmer had been due to hold a bilateral meeting on Friday with the president of Ghana Nana Akufo-Addo, who has spoken in favour of reparations in the past, but it was called off because of timing constraints.

Updated

Starmer confronts slavery reparations calls in address to Commonwealth leaders

Keir Starmer has confronted calls for the UK to pay reparations for its historical part in the slave trade while surrounded by Commonwealth leaders.

Speaking at an executive session of a Commonwealth summit in Samoa, the prime minister said it was important to acknowledge a “hard” shared history, and that he understood the “strength of feeling” about reparations, reports the PA news agency.

Flanked by leaders from Uganda and Tanzania, Starmer said he wanted to work “together to make sure the future is not in the shadow of the past”, and promised to host a UK-Caribbean forum with leaders of the nations most affected by slavery’s legacy.

The prime minister has insisted reparations are not on the table for the Commonwealth summit, even as leaders from Caribbean and African member states have called for discussions on the issue.

The UK has conceded that the issue of reparations could be included in a document due to be signed off at the Commonwealth heads of government meeting this week.

The PA news agency reports that sources accept that there could be a reference to reparatory justice in the communique, but officials stressed that this would not necessarily mean any change in the UK’s policy position.

More on that in a moment, but first, here is an update of the latest developments in UK politics:

  • Keir Starmer does not think all owners of stocks and shares fall outside his definition of “working people”, Downing Street has signalled. The prime minister had suggested asset owners would not fall within his conception of what a working person is. The government has been asked repeatedly to define this term, in a bid to establish which taxes may rise in the budget.

  • Downing Street is blocking moves to include a ban on smoking outdoors in the upcoming Tobacco and Vapes bill amid fierce opposition by the hospitality trade. No 10 officials privately believe that banning people from lighting up in pub gardens is “an unserious” policy and is not backed by good evidence showing that it harms non-smokers.

  • A Treasury minister has said he does not accept the idea that changes to the fiscal rules could “punish families with mortgages”, as was suggested by former chancellor Jeremy Hunt. When asked on Times Radio whether he accepted that, James Murray, the exchequer secretary to the Treasury said “well, no.”

  • Rachel Reeves will pledge to reverse huge cuts in public investment in her budget next week after she confirmed that rules limiting her spending power will be overhauled to enable the government to release as much as £50bn for infrastructure spending.

  • Businesses that import critical minerals to the UK will be given access to state-backed loans in a move to counter China’s dominance in the market. The chancellor is expected to announce extra government support to encourage the import of critical minerals such as lithium, graphite and cobalt in her budget next week.

  • The value of the UK’s private healthcare market rose to a record £12.4bn last year as long NHS waiting lists fuelled demand from individuals and the health service paid for nearly £3.5bn of procedures to help ease the care backlog.

  • A group that emerged out of a faction of the Conservative party has become a forum for Britain’s splintered far right. A private conference hosted earlier this month by the Traditional Britain Group (TBG) was attended by figures from the Homeland party, an extreme nationalist group, as well as rivals from other groups such as Patriotic Alternative.

Updated

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.