Get all your news in one place.
100’s of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
Top News
Top News
Politics

Special Counsel's allegations against President Biden debunked, deemed unnecessary and political

Joe Biden is seen in UAW strike

In a recent interview, Democratic congressman from New York, Daniel Goldman, shared his perspective on the special counsel's report regarding the mental acuity of President Biden and its implications. The report suggested that President Biden, if put on trial, may present himself as a sympathetic elderly man with poor memory, based on the notebooks that were believed to have been shared with a ghostwriter. Congressman Goldman, however, disagrees with the special counsel's reasoning, finding it unnecessary and lacking substantial evidence.

According to Congressman Goldman, the case against President Biden is predicated on the notion that he knowingly and willfully retained classified information while he was a private citizen. The evidence, in his view, is based on tenuous grounds, comparing notebooks to actually marked classified documents. He argues that President Biden, in his previous role, took extensive notes, some of which could have been unclassified, and it is understandable that he believed his notes were his own, especially if they were not marked as classified. Congressman Goldman emphasizes the importance of examining the marked classified documents that President Biden possessed knowingly and willfully, rather than focusing on his credibility or recollection.

Furthermore, Congressman Goldman dismisses the idea that President Biden's credibility as a witness would have any bearing on the evidence, asserting that it is a misunderstanding. Drawing from his experience as a former prosecutor, he states that defendant credibility is typically not considered in determining intent but may influence how the evidence is explained. He characterizes the special counsel's inclusion of President Biden's credibility as gratuitous and politically motivated, taking a dig during an election year.

Evidence of knowingly and willfully retaining classified information is thin.
Trial Mr. Biden presented as sympathetic elderly man with poor memory.
Difference between notebooks and marked classified documents is significant.

When asked about President Biden's performance in the recent interview, Congressman Goldman believes that he helped himself by strongly denouncing accusations that he would not remember significant moments, such as the death of his son. The congressman highlights President Biden's expertise in foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East region. He recounts a conversation he had with the president, wherein he displayed extensive knowledge of the region and had already reached out to various leaders following a Hamas attack. Congressman Goldman praises President Biden's experience and understanding, emphasizing the benefits his age brings in terms of wisdom and knowledge.

In conclusion, Congressman Daniel Goldman takes issue with the special counsel's assessment of President Biden's mental acuity, deeming it unnecessary and lacking in substantial evidence. He asserts that the focus should be on marked classified documents rather than notebooks, and disputes the relevance of the president's credibility as a witness. Goldman also commends President Biden for his adeptness in foreign policy matters and highlights the benefits of his age and experience.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100’s of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.