In a recent interview, Democratic congressman from New York, Daniel Goldman, shared his perspective on the special counsel's report regarding the mental acuity of President Biden and its implications. The report suggested that President Biden, if put on trial, may present himself as a sympathetic elderly man with poor memory, based on the notebooks that were believed to have been shared with a ghostwriter. Congressman Goldman, however, disagrees with the special counsel's reasoning, finding it unnecessary and lacking substantial evidence.
According to Congressman Goldman, the case against President Biden is predicated on the notion that he knowingly and willfully retained classified information while he was a private citizen. The evidence, in his view, is based on tenuous grounds, comparing notebooks to actually marked classified documents. He argues that President Biden, in his previous role, took extensive notes, some of which could have been unclassified, and it is understandable that he believed his notes were his own, especially if they were not marked as classified. Congressman Goldman emphasizes the importance of examining the marked classified documents that President Biden possessed knowingly and willfully, rather than focusing on his credibility or recollection.
