Get all your news in one place.
100's of premium titles.
One app.
Start reading
The Guardian - UK
The Guardian - UK
Politics
Andrew Sparrow

UK should have ‘robust but constructive’ talks with Beijing, says David Lammy – as it happened

David Lammy, left, and Wang Yi shake hands in front of the UK and China flags.
David Lammy, left, and Wang Yi meet at the Foreign Office in Westminster. Photograph: James Manning/PA

Afternoon summary

  • Keir Starmer has angered the farming lobby by suggesting the public would prefer the government to spend money on the NHS than on “tax breaks for farmers”. (See 4.55pm and 5.30pm.) He was speaking after farmers disrupted a visit he was making to publicise the government’s plans for new towns (see 11.11am).

I do not recognise any of the accusations or claims that have been made against Rachel Reeves.

In my role, I would have been made aware of any investigation which concluded there was a case to answer. I would have been required to organise and oversee a disciplinary process. This did not happen. Under the Financial Conduct Authority’s rules, any such accusations would have to have been properly investigated.

Under the company’s then expenses policy, birthday gifts and Christmas presents could be purchased using motivation cards. Indeed, staff were encouraged to do so for their teams.

  • David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said the UK will continue engage in “robust and constructive” talks with Beijing as he met his Chinese counterpart in London. (See 3.26pm.)

Farmers to Action, the group that organised the protest that disrupted a visit by Keir Starmer near Milton Keynes today, has put out a statement criticising him for his response (see 11.11am) and for not discussing the inheritance tax issue directly with farmers. Referring to the response, and Starmer’s claim the nation had to choose between higher NHS spending and “tax breaks for farmers”, the campaigners said:

The demonstrates PM Keir Scarpers complete disconnect with and contempt for everyday working people and shows extreme irresponsibility while in the seat of power. Our food security is paramount and that is why the majority of British people are opposed to these attacks on our farmers businesses and veterans, amongst others.

While farmers are grappling with the existential issues facing them caused by the new IHT rules imposed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves at the last budget, it seems it is too much for the British Prime Minister to address their concerns.

Sign up to read this article
Read news from 100's of titles, curated specifically for you.
Already a member? Sign in here
Related Stories
Top stories on inkl right now
One subscription that gives you access to news from hundreds of sites
Already a member? Sign in here
Our Picks
Fourteen days free
Download the app
One app. One membership.
100+ trusted global sources.