As the parent/carer of autistic children, I’m pleased that my kids have more visibility in mainstream culture with the launch of the “autistic Barbie” doll (Mattel launches its first autistic Barbie, 12 January). For the kids, they’re interested, but, given my youngest’s penchant for graffiti, “autistic Barbie” will be drawn all over and resemble “weird Barbie” in no time.
I’ve found it hard to share this pleasure, having seen my academic and activist colleagues slam the doll. I completely understand their reasoning. Of course it lacks nuance to use visible accessories to represent a hidden disability. Of course one doll cannot show the breadth, richness and even pain of the autistic experience.
I read one critic ask how she shows burnout. I’d imagine that’s down to the kids to convey, which is my point: most critics are not reviewing this as it’s intended – a child’s toy. The strongest opinions, for the most part, are from those who would not buy Barbie anyway. To them, I say she’s just Barbie.
Dr Erin Beeston
Urmston, Greater Manchester
• Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
