Top Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee are carefully considering their stance on President-elect Donald Trump's pick for attorney general, former GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz. The committee members are keeping their options open and are approaching the situation with caution.
Senator John Cornyn expressed his desire to see the findings of a House Ethics Committee probe into sexual misconduct allegations against Gaetz before making a decision. He emphasized the importance of following the Senate's normal process in evaluating Gaetz's nomination.
Senators Lindsey Graham and Thom Tillis were less definitive on the need to review the House committee's report. Graham highlighted the need to adhere to the established rules and procedures, while Tillis emphasized the importance of respecting the Ethics Committee's jurisdiction.
Senator Josh Hawley emphasized that the House Ethics Committee's investigation is a matter for the House to handle. He stressed the need for a thorough background check on all nominees to ensure their suitability for the position.
Graham and Tillis both underscored the significance of treating presidential nominees with respect and evaluating their qualifications. Graham mentioned his past experience of supporting nominees he may not personally like, highlighting the importance of following due process.
Regarding Gaetz's resignation and the pending Ethics Committee report, House Ethics Chairman Michael Guest maintained the confidentiality of the committee's proceedings. Gaetz's resignation effectively ended the investigation, as the House's jurisdiction is limited to current members of Congress.
In conclusion, the Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans are approaching the nomination of Matt Gaetz with careful consideration, emphasizing the need for a thorough evaluation of his qualifications and the importance of following established procedures.
