Racist online abuse directed at Sadiq Khan is forecast by the end of 2023 to be at its highest in three years, a new study claims.
An analysis produced by City Hall found Mr Khan has already received about 170 per cent more race-related abuse this year than he had by this point in 2022.
It says that over the total course of 2023, Mr Khan is “on track” to receive over 20,000 racist or racialised “abuse mentions” on social media, which would be the most in any year since 2020, when 17,690 such mentions were recorded.
The study also states that the amount of race-related abuse the mayor has received that mentions the Ultra low emission zone (Ulez) or air quality policies has increased “exponentially” in recent months.
City Hall has said at least 317,736 racist and racialised abuse messages mentioning Mr Khan have been sent since 2016.
The study’s authors add: “If we were to widen our search criteria to include other types of abuse, then we’d be looking at much larger numbers (closer to a million messages).”
Georgie Laming, director of campaigns at the advocacy group HOPE not hate, said Mr Khan “is subjected to strikingly high levels of racial abuse, which speaks to the vilification of Muslim figures in public life”.
However, the current level of racist abuse received by Mr Khan’s social media accounts is still shown in the analysis to be far below that recorded during most of Donald Trump’s time as US President.
In 2016 and 2017, the mayor is said to have received more racist abuse from America than he did from the UK. Mr Khan received a record high of 88,262 racist mentions in 2017.
Much of that abuse came after Mr Trump tweeted after the London Bridge terror attack: “At least 7 dead and 48 wounded in terror attack and Mayor of London says there is ‘no reason to be alarmed!’”
The following day, he posted: “Pathetic excuse by London Mayor Sadiq Khan who had to think fast on his “no reason to be alarmed” statement. MSM [mainstream media] is working hard to sell it!”
The quote cited by Mr Trump was taken out of context, as the mayor had told Londoners there was no reason to be alarmed about the increased police presence on the streets after the attack.
“Abuse frequently sought to tie Sadiq to terrorist incidents, such as the Manchester Arena and London Bridge attacks,” the study says.
“Other abuse cited Sadiq’s supposed links to Muslim grooming gangs, jihadis, and the Muslim Brotherhood.”
The study’s authors also claim that their findings indicate that “dissatisfaction about Ulez is either radicalising social media users or attracting the far right into online discussions about clean air policies”.
The analysis attempted to trace where racist abuse linked with Ulez is originating from geographically.
“Not all mentions online have available location information, but of those that are traceable, 43 per cent originated in London,” it says.
“Interestingly, that means that 57 per cent originated outside the city.”
Ms Laming, of HOPE not hate, said: “Whilst opposition to Ulez comes from many sources, a small but vocal contingent has adopted a toxic and increasingly extreme anti-Khan angle.
“The involvement of individuals linked to the conspiracy theory-driven protests that emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic and elements of the far right in anti-Ulez campaigning has fuelled the levels of abuse.”
In addition, the study found that the mayor is continuing to receive a relatively high level of abuse from accounts in India. Mr Khan is said to have already received more abuse from India this year than he did throughout the whole of last year.
“With tensions high in India and across South Asia, we expect any major news event with even a tenuous link to either India or Pakistan to trigger rises in abuse towards Sadiq,” it says.
The analysis characterises racist abuse as “explicitly racist or actively racialised; e.g. linking Sadiq to Sharia Law, jihad, terrorist attacks, or using keywords like ‘Londonistan’”.
The study’s authors have also included the term ‘Khanage’, which they admit is “not explicitly racist”, but they say “is often used in racist posts”.
They added that because of the difficulty in tracking abuse across every social media platform, “the vast majority of the abuse we’re able to analyse originates from Twitter”.
Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, said: “Self-regulation by social media platforms has failed. Twitter is failing to act on racist abuse that their own terms and conditions prohibit.
“This is why we need the Online Safety Bill to hold failing platforms, and their owners, to account for abuse, hate, threats, and coordinated foreign harassment campaigns.”
